Halton Co v. Streivor Inc

Filing 37

STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 3, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2010)

Case3:10-cv-00655-WHA Document36

Filed06/03/10 Page1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Julie M. Holloway (State Bar No. 196942) [e-mail] Richard G. Frenkel (State Bar No. 204133) [e-mail] WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Kurt C. Rommel (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] J. Douglas Cuthbertson (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] D. Margeaux Witherspoon (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] MILES & STOCKBRIDGE P.C. 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 500 McLean, Virginia 22102 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Halton Company

David Schnapf (State Bar No. 100199) [e-mail] TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP Two Embarcadero Center Eighth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Jon V. Swenson (State Bar No. 233054) [e-mail] G. Ross Allen (State Bar No. 262968) [e-mail] TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 379 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant Streivor, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

HALTON CO., a Kentucky corporation, Plaintiff, v. STREIVOR, INC., a California corporation, Defendant.

) CASE NO.: C 10-00655 WHA ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE ) FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Pursuant to the Court's May 27 Case Management Order (D.I. 34), ¶ 3, the parties have met and conferred, and have proposed the following briefing schedule leading up to the Claim Construction Tutorial set by the Court for December 1, 2010 at 1:30 p.m., and the Claim Construction Hearing set by the Court for December 15, 2010 at 1:30 p.m.:
PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO.: C 10-00655 WHA

-1-

Case3:10-cv-00655-WHA Document36

Filed06/03/10 Page2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
UNIT ED

Description of Case Event Patent L.R. 3-1 Preliminary Infringement Contentions and Patent L.R. 3-2 Document Production Patent L.R. 3-3 Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and Patent L.R. 3-4 & 3-7 Document Productions Patent L.R. 4-1 Exchange of Proposed Terms Patent L.R. 4-2 Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions Patent L.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Patent L.R. 4-4 Close of Claim Construction Discovery Patent L.R. 4-5(a) Opening Claim Construction Brief Patent L.R. 4-5(b) Responsive Claim Construction Brief Patent L.R. 4-5(c) Reply Claim Construction Brief Tutorial Claim Construction Hearing

Proposed Date June 24, 2010 August 9, 2010 August 16, 2010 September 8, 2010 September 24, 2010 October 15, 2010 November 3, 2010 November 17, 2010 November 24, 2010 December 1, 20101 December 15, 20102

The Court finds good cause for entry of the above stipulated briefing schedule, and thus IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above Claim Construction briefing schedule is ENTERED.
S DISTRICT TE C TA

20 21 22

Dated: _June ______________ ____3, 2010.

23 24 25 26 27 28
1 2

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

Per ¶ 4 of the Court's May 27 Case Management Order. Per ¶ 3 of the Court's May 27 Case Management Order. -2-

PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO.: C 10-00655 WHA

A

C

LI

FO

Judge W

lsup illiam A

R NIA

___________________________ Honorable William D . Alsup H VE ROstrict Judge United StAtPP Di a es
S
NO

RT U O

RT

H

Case3:10-cv-00655-WHA Document36

Filed06/03/10 Page3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: June 3, 2010

Respectfully submitted, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ Richard G. Frenkel Richard G. Frenkel

MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, P.C. By: /s/ Kurt C. Rommel Kurt C. Rommel (pro hac vice) J. Douglas Cuthbertson (pro hac vice) D. Margeaux Witherspoon (pro hac vice)

Attorneys for Plaintiff HALTON CO.

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP By: /s/ David Schnapf David Schnapf Jon V. Swenson G. Ross Allen

Attorneys for Defendant STREIVOR, INC.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I, Richard G. Frenkel, attest that I obtained the concurrence of Kurt C. Rommel and David Schnapf in filing this document. I declare under penalty of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 3rd day of June 2010 at Palo Alto, California. /s/ Richard G. Frenkel Richard G. Frenkel

PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO.: C 10-00655 WHA

-3-