Nasir v. Napolitano et al

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING MSJ FROM 8/11/10 TO 9/15/10 re 33 Stipulation filed by Alejandro Mayorkas, Janet Napolitano. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/15/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2010)

Download PDF
Nasir v. Napolitano et al Doc. 34 1 J OSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332 United States Attorney 2 J OANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143 Assistant United States Attorney 3 Chief, Civil Division ILA C. DEISS, NY SBN 3052909 4 Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 5 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7124 6 Fax: (415) 436-7169 Email: ila.deiss@usdoj.gov 7 TONY WEST 8 Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division DAVID J. KLINE 9 Di rect or J OSHUA E.T. BRAUNSTEIN 10 Assistant Director LANA VAHAB (DC 976203) 11 Trial Attorney Office of Immigration Litigation 12 Civil Division, Justice Department P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station 13 Washington, D.C. 20044 Tel: (202) 532-4067 14 Fax: (202) 305-7000 Email: lana.vahab@usdoj.gov 15 Attorneys for the Defendants 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 LEMAR SANTANA NASIR, ) 20 ) No. C 10-0656 EMC P l aint i ff , ) 21 ) v. ) STIPULATION TO RESET HEARING 22 ) ON PARTIES' MOTION FOR J ANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT; and 23 Department of Homeland Security; ) [PROPOSED] ORDER ALEJ ANDRO MAYORKAS, Director of the ) 24 Department of Homeland Security, United ) States Citizenship and Immigration Services, ) Date: August 11, 2010 25 ) Time: 10:30 a.m. Defendant s . ) 26 ________________________________________) 27 The Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their 28 attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to reset the hearing date on the parties' motion for summary Stipulation to Reset Hearing C 10-0656 EMC 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 judgment currently scheduled for August 11, 2010 to September 15, 2010, as the parties are 2 actively trying to resolve this matter without further litigation. 3 The parties agree that rescheduling the hearing date will have no effect on the scheduling of 4 other aspects of the proceedings, and shall not impact the timing of, or any party's ability to 5 propound or duty to respond to discovery requests. 6 7 8 9 The parties propose the following briefing schedule: Defendants' Opposition: and cross-motion Plaintiff's Reply and opposition Defendants' Reply August 18, 2010 September 1, 2010 August 25, 2010. September 1, 2010 Respectfully submitted, J OSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / s / _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ ILA C. DEISS1 Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants 10 Dated: July 14, 2010 11 12 13 14 15 16 Dated: July 14, 2010 17 18 19 __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ / s / _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J ASON H. LEE Attorney for Plaintiff ORDER 20 Based on the foregoing, the hearing on the parties' motion for summary judgment is reset to 21 September 15, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. 22 23 Dated: 24 25 26 July 15, 2010 3:00 p.m. UNIT ED en d M. Ch e Edwar Judg 1 27 I, Ila Deiss, hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures ER indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. C 28 N F Stipulation to Reset Hearing C 10-0656 EMC D IS T IC T O R 2 A LI FO R NIA __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ EDWARD M. CHEN ED DER UniT d S SO OR te I States Magistrate Judge D S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O I AS MO DIFIE NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?