Flowbee International, Inc. et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 55

NOTICE of need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d) (Caruso, Margret) (Filed on 5/13/2010)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Flowbee International, Inc., et al.

CASE NO. C 10-00668-WHA Plaintiff(s), v.
Google Inc.

NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR PHONE CONFERENCE

Defendant(s).
____________________________________/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and that they:

9 9

have not yet reached an agreement to an ADR process reques t an Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge

June 3, 2010 Date of Case Management Conference ___________________

The following counsel will participate in the ADR phone conference: Name
Margret M. Caruso David T. Bright Damien P. Lillis

Party Representing
Google Inc.

Phone No.
[phone]

E-Mail Address

[e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail]

___________________________________________________________________________
Flowbee International, Inc., et al. [phone] Flowbee International, Inc., et al. [phone]

___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________

Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 3-5 require that lead trial counsel participate in a telephone conference with a member of the ADR Legal Staff before the Case Management Conference. The ADR Unit ([e-mail]) will notify you of the date and time of your phone conference.

May 13, 2010 Dated:___________

Dami___ _ l is ____en P._Li_l____________ Attorney for Plaintiff

M____ 201_ Dated:__ay 13,___0 __

Rev 12.05

_M_rg_et__._Car__o ________ _ a _ r _ M __ us _ Attorney for Defendant When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the ADR Docket Event entitled "Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d)."

1

Filer's attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained 2 from Damien Lillis. 3 DATED: May 13, 2010 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ Margret M. Caruso