Flowbee International, Inc. et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 55

NOTICE of need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d) (Caruso, Margret) (Filed on 5/13/2010)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Flowbee International, Inc., et al. CASE NO. C 10-00668-WHA Plaintiff(s), v. Google Inc. NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR PHONE CONFERENCE Defendant(s). ____________________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and that they: 9 9 have not yet reached an agreement to an ADR process reques t an Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge June 3, 2010 Date of Case Management Conference ___________________ The following counsel will participate in the ADR phone conference: Name Margret M. Caruso David T. Bright Damien P. Lillis Party Representing Google Inc. Phone No. (650) 801-5101 E-Mail Address margretcaruso@quinnemanuel.com dbright@wgclawfirm.com dlillis@slplawfirm.com ___________________________________________________________________________ Flowbee International, Inc., et al. (361) 887-0500 Flowbee International, Inc., et al. (415) 814-0411 ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 3-5 require that lead trial counsel participate in a telephone conference with a member of the ADR Legal Staff before the Case Management Conference. The ADR Unit (adr@cand.uscourts.gov) will notify you of the date and time of your phone conference. May 13, 2010 Dated:___________ Dami___ _ l is ____en P._Li_l____________ Attorney for Plaintiff M____ 201_ Dated:__ay 13,___0 __ Rev 12.05 _M_rg_et__._Car__o ________ _ a _ r _ M __ us _ Attorney for Defendant When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the ADR Docket Event entitled "Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d)." 1 Filer's attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained 2 from Damien Lillis. 3 DATED: May 13, 2010 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ Margret M. Caruso

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?