Flowbee International, Inc. et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 6

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Google, Inc., filed.(Babcock, Charles)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION FLOWBEE INTERNATIONAL, INC. and FLOWBEE HAIRCUTTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaint iffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. C-09-199 DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS: COMES NOW Defendant Google Inc. and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and the Court's Order for Conference and Disclosure of Interested Parties dated August 13, 2009, hereby shows as follows: Defendant Google Inc. certifies that the following persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, affiliates, parent corporations, or other entities have an interest in the outcome of this lawsuit: 1. 94043. Google Inc. is publicly traded as "GOOG." Google Inc. does not have a parent Defendant Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheater Parkway, Mountain View, California corporation and no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of the stock of Google Inc. Defendant Google Inc.'s Certificate of Interested Parties Page 1 Local counsel for Google Inc. are as follows: Charles "Chip" L. Babcock (Lead Local Counsel) Texas State Bar No. 01479500 Federal Bar No. 10982 Jackson Walker L.L.P. 1401 McKinney, Suite 1900 Houston, Texas 77010 Carl C. Butzer Texas State Bar No. 03545900 Federal Bar No. 16376 Jackson Walker L.L.P. 901 Main Street, Suite 6000 Dallas, Texas 75202 Of counsel for Google Inc. is as follows: Margret M. Caruso (pro hac vice application to follow; as well as motion for leave to be designated attorney-in-charge) California State Bar No. 243473 Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, California 94065 2. Plaint iffs Flowbee International, Inc., Flowbee Haircutter Limited Partnership, Rick Hunts and their attorneys of record as follows: David T. Bright Texas State Bar No. 02991490 Federal Bar No. 8628 Mikal C. Watts Texas State Bar No. 20918120 Federal Bar No. 12419 Christopher V. Goodpastor Texas State Bar No. 00791991 Federal Bar No. 18505 Watts Guerra Craft, LLP 555 North Carancahua, Suite 1400 Corpus Christi, Texas 78478 Defendant Google Inc.'s Certificate of Interested Parties Page 2 Respect fully submitted, s/ Charles L. Babcock CHARLES L. "CHIP" BABCOCK Texas State Bar No. 01479500 Federal Bar No. 10982 JACKSON WALKER L.L.P. 1401 McKinney, Suite 1900 Houston, TX 77010-4008 (713) 752-4210 (713) 308-4110 - Fax Email: cbabcock@jw.com CARL C. BUTZER Texas State Bar No. 03545900 Federal Bar No. 16376 JACKSON WALKER L.L.P. 901 Main Street, Suite 6000 Dallas, Texas 75202 (214) 953-5902 (214) 661-6609 - Fax Email: cbutzer@jw.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. OF COUNSEL: Margret M. Caruso (pro hac vice application to follow) California State Bar No. 243473 Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, California 94065 (650) 801-5101 (650) 801-5100 Fax Email: margretcaruso@quinnemanuel.com ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. Defendant Google Inc.'s Certificate of Interested Parties Page 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 9, 2009, I electronically submitted the foregoing document with the clerk of the court for the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, using the electronic case files system of the court. The electronic case files system sent a "Notice of Electronic Filing" to individuals who have consented in writing to accept this Notice as service of this document by electronic means. All other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by first class mail today, September 9, 2009. _s/ Charles L. Babcock________________. Charles L. Babcock Defendant Google Inc.'s Certificate of Interested Parties Page 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?