Implicit Networks, Inc. v. VMWare, Inc. et al

Filing 29

ORDER granting extension (#28) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Katherine Kelly Lutton (CA Bar No. 194971) [e-mail] Tamara Fraizer (CA Bar No. 215942) [e-mail] Robert J. Kent (CA Bar No. 250905) [e-mail] FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, California 94063-1526 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Implicit Networks, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant VMware, Inc. ("VMware") file this Stipulated Joint Motion and Proposed Order to Extend Time for Defendant VMware, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The parties have a mutual interest in the orderly and efficient conduct of this litigation, and they agree that this extension of time will assist the parties in formulating their pleadings and responses in the present action. Having thus met and conferred on the issue, the parties hereby stipulate that VMware's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint should be
STIPULATED JT. MOT. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR VMWARE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Case No. C 10-00720 SI

IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff, v. VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC., Defendants.

Case No. C 10-00720 SI STIPULATED JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT VMWARE, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

extended 30 days until June 14, 2010, and also move the court to order that this deadline be extended to June 14, 2010. Dated: Ma y 11, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Katherine Kelly Lutton Katherine Kelly Lutton Attorney for Defendants VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC.

Dated: May 11, 2010

HOSIE RICE LLP

By: /s/ Katherine Kelly Lutton On behalf of Spencer Hosie Spencer Hosie Attorney for Plaintiff IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.

DECLARATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Spencer Hosie. Dated: Ma y 11, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Katherine Kelly Lutton Katherine Kelly Lutton Attorney for Defendants VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC.

50713345.doc

2

STIPULATED JT. MOT. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR VMWARE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1 2 3 4 5 Dated: ________________, 2010. 6 7 8 9 10
50713345.doc

ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant VMware's answer or other response to Implicit Network's complaint shall be due on June 14, 2010.

Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court Judge

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3
STIPULATED JT. MOT. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR VMWARE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
50713345.doc

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on May 11, 2010, all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of STIPULATED JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT VMWARE, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule 5-4 and General Order 45. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail. /s/ Katherine Kelly Lutton Katherine Kelly Lutton

4

STIPULATED JT. MOT. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR VMWARE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Case No. C 10-00720 SI