Rupert et al v. Jones et al

Filing 39

ORDER Directing Clerk to Transfer Action to San Francisco or Oakland Division. Signed by Judge Whyte on 7/13/10. (rmwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2010)

Download PDF
Rupert et al v. Jones et al Doc. 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: 7/13/10 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge This action arises out of the alleged unlawful taking of real property located in Mendocino County and should be assigned to either the San Francisco or Oakland division pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-2(d). A declination to proceed before a Magistrate Judge has been filed precluding assignment of the action to the full-time Magistrate Judge in the Eureka Division, which would otherwise have been appropriate pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-2(f), so under Local Rule 3-2(d), the case should now be assigned to either the San Francisco Division or Oakland Division. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to reassign the case pursuant to the Civil Local Rules and the Court's Assignment Plan and to implement the transfer upon reassignment. v. BARBARA J.R. JONES, et al., Defendants. WILLIAM RUPERT and CAROL SLATER, Plaintiffs No. C-10-0721 RMW ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO TRANSFER ACTION TO SAN FRANCISCO OR OAKLAND DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION E-FILED on 7/13/10 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO TRANSFER ACTION TO SAN FRANCISCO OR OAKLAND DIVISION--No. C-10-0721 RMW TER Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?