Lowy et al v. Internal Revenue Service

Filing 63

ORDER DISMISSING CASE (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011)

Download PDF
8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs PETER AND JANINE LOWY, BEVERLY PARK CORPORATION ER H 7 R NIA FO Judge S RT 6 ston usan Ill NO 5 LI 4 DERED O OR IT IS S A 3 UNIT ED 2 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 1 CHADBOURNE & PARKE LLP ABBE DAVID LOWELL (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) adlowell@chadbourne.com PAMELA J. MARPLE (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) pmarple@chadbourne.com 1200 New Hampshire Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: 202-974-5600 Facsimile: 202-974-5602 Filed10/26/11 Page1 of 2 S Case3:10-cv-00767-SI Document62 N F D IS T IC T O R C 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 PETER LOWY, JANINE LOWY, BEVERLY PARK CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, CASE NO. CV 10-00767 SI v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 17 18 It is stipulated and agreed that the complaint in the above-entitled case be 19 dismissed with prejudice, the parties to bear their respective costs, including any 20 possible attorneys' fees or other expenses of this litigation. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ ABBE DAVID LOWELL PAMELA J. MARPLE Chadbourne & Parke LLP 1200 New Hampshire Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Counsel for Plaintiffs STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL /s/ CARMEN M. BANERJEE Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 227 Washington, D.C. 20044 Counsel for Defendant CASE NO. CV 10-00767 SI Case3:10-cv-00767-SI Document62 Filed10/26/11 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 26, 2011, I caused a true and correct copy of the 4 5 foregoing to be served via the Court’s ECF system to all counsel of record in this matter. 6 7 /s/ Pamela J. Marple 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CASE NO. CV 10-00767 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?