United States Of America v. Jones et al
Filing
70
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT by Hon. William Alsup granting 65 Motion for Judgment.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
No. C 10-00796 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
BENJAMIN JONES, MICHELLE YU,
OFFICE OF TAX COLLECTOR SAN
MATEO COUNTY, NATIONAL CITY
MORTGAGE COMPANY, UNIFUND CCR
PARTNERS, EMPLOYMENT
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, FRANCHISE TAX
BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and
BANK OF AMERICA N.A.,
Defendants.
/
19
20
An order granted the government’s motion for summary judgment and set forth a
21
procedure to carry out a foreclosure sale of the subject property. It required a status report to be
22
filed after the sale, after which filing all parties would have fourteen days to assert that they
23
were due some of the sale proceeds.
24
Instead of this scenario, defendant Michelle Yu refinanced the subject property and it
25
appears that she paid the owed amount to the government. The government dismissed its claim
26
against Michelle Yu (Dkt. No. 64). So instead of filing a status report regarding foreclosure by
27
the deadline, the government filed a motion for entry of judgment. The deadline for filing an
28
opposition has passed, and no one has opposed.
1
The proposed judgment submitted by the government proposes dismissal with prejudice
2
of all parties other than Benjamin Jones. As to defendant Jones, judgment would be entered
3
against him “in the amount $168,141.71 for his delinquent federal income tax liabilities for the
4
year 2000 plus related penalties and interest, as of February 24, 2010, plus interest accruing and
5
statutory additions accruing after February 24, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1961(c),
6
until fully paid.” Defendant Jones previously stipulated that judgment including such terms
7
should be entered against him (Dkt. No. 6). This action took a detour to resolve the claims
8
between Michelle Yu and the government, but now that the government’s claim has been
9
satisfied as to all parties other than defendant Jones, the stipulated terms of judgment will be
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
entered concurrently herewith.
The government’s motion for entry of judgment is GRANTED, and the hearing on June
16 is VACATED. The Clerk shall close the file.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
Dated: May 31, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?