Bacchus v. Tucker et al

Filing 28

ORDER DISCHARGING OSC; ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING RE MOTION TO DISMISS re 27 Order to Show Cause, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,,, ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 27 Order to Show Cause, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, 15 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Darrell Shawn Tucker; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss Darrell Shawn Tucker : Motion Hearing set for 12/16/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/12/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2010)

Download PDF
Bacchus v. Tucker et al Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California CEDRIC BACCHUS, v. Plaintiff, No. C 10-00804 MEJ ORDER DISCHARGING TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING RE: MOTION TO DISMISS DARRELL SHAWN TUCKER, et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On November 1, 2010, the Court ordered Plaintiff Cedric Bacchus to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and comply with court deadlines. Having received Plaintiff's counsel's declaration in response, the Court hereby DISCHARGES the order to show cause. As Defendant's motion to dismiss remains pending, (Dkt. #15), the Court shall conduct a hearing on December 16, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Plaintiff shall e-file any opposition or statement of nonopposition by November 18, 2010, and Defendant shall file any reply by December 2, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 12, 2010 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?