Tishau Partners v. Miles

Filing 22

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY REQUEST FOR STAY OF ORDER, OBJECTION, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. Defendant is instructed not to file any furhter pleadings in this closed case. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 25, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. v. GRACE MILES, Defendant. / TISHAU PARTNERS, Plaintiff, No. C 10-0835 SI ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S "EMERGENCY REQUEST FOR STAY OF ORDER, OBJECTION, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION" IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In an order filed March 24, 2010, the Court remanded this case to state court, holding that the removal was untimely and that there is no basis for jurisdiction over this unlawful detainer action. On March 25, 2010, defendant filed an "Emergency Request for Stay of Order, Objection, Request for Reconsideration." Defendant states that the removal was in fact timely because her bankruptcy filing somehow tolled the time to file a notice of removal. Defendant does not cite any authority for this proposition. However, regardless of whether the removal was timely, the fact remains that defendant has not demonstrated any basis for this Court's jurisdiction. Accordingly, defendant's motion is DENIED. Defendant is instructed not to file any further pleadings in this closed case.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?