Lyon v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.

Filing 18

ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO REMAND. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 14, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ANNE MARIE LYON, Plaintiff, v. W W GRAINGER INC, Defendant. / ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO REMAND No. C 10-00884 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Anna Marie Lyon filed a motion to remand that was scheduled to be heard on April 29, 2010. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, defendant's opposition was due on April 8, 2010, but no opposition was received. On April 9, 2010, plaintiff filed a notice to continue the hearing on her motion to May 6, 2010. However, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-7, a party may not continue a noticed hearing date after the date on which the opposition was due, even if no opposition has yet been received. Plaintiff's notice to continue was filed after the deadline. Pursuant to an order to show cause, the parties have explained that defendant did not file a timely opposition because the parties agreed on April 6 to continue the hearing date on plaintiff's motion until May 6 and defendant did not discover until after the deadline that plaintiff's notice to continue was filed late. The parties must take care to meet all future deadlines in this matter. Defendant's opposition shall be filed no later than NOON ON APRIL 15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff's reply shall be filed no later than NOON ON APRIL 22. The motion shall be decided without oral argument. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?