Perry v. Haws

Filing 6

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/7/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 *E-Filed 4/7/10* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION TIMOTHY WAYNE PERRY, JR., Petitioner, v. FREDERICK B. HAWS, Warden, Respondent. / No. C 10-0961 RS (PR) ORDER OF TRANSFER Petitioner Timothy Wayne Perry, Jr., has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus to challenge his conviction in the Solano County Superior Court. Solano County is in the venue of the Eastern District of California. Venue is proper in a habeas action in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction, 28 U.S.C. 2241(d); however, a petition challenging a conviction or the sentence imposed is preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b). Because the conviction occurred in the Eastern District of California, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) and Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b), and in the interests of justice, this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The Clerk shall transfer this matter forthwith. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 7, 2010 RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge No. C 10-0961 RS (PR) ORDER OF TRANSFER 1 2 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO: Timothy Wayne Perry, Jr. Prisoner Id F-87009 3 C.S.P. Los Angeles County 44750 60th Street West 4 Lancaster, CA 93539 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 No. C 10-0961 RS (PR) ORDER OF TRANSFER DATED: 04/7/2010 s/ Chambers Staff Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg * Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to any co-counsel who have not registered with the Court's electronic filing system.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?