Ayala v. Ayers et al
Filing
177
ORDER re 151 MOTION for Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/22/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
REYNALDO AYALA,
9
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 10-00979 JSW
v.
ROBERT AYERS, JR, ET AL.,
12
ORDER RE MOTION FOR AN
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Defendants.
/
13
14
Now before the Court is the motion filed by Plaintiff Reynaldo Ayala for an order
15
requiring Defendants D. Schlosser, J. Guthrie, J. Wagner, and S. Faaita (collectively, “Custody
16
Staff Defendants”) to file an answer to the Third Amended Complaint. The Court finds that this
17
matter is appropriate for disposition without oral argument and it is deemed submitted. See Civ.
18
L.R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the hearing set for March 22, 2013 is HEREBY VACATED. Having
19
considered the parties’ papers and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the
20
Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s request.
21
Defendants to a lawsuit brought by a prison inmate may formally waive their right to
22
reply to a complaint. According to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(1), “[a]ny defendant may waive the
23
right to reply to any action brought by a prisoner confined to any jail, prison, or other
24
correctional facility under section 1983 of this title or any other Federal law.” However, the
25
Court may order that defendants to respond to the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
26
1997e(g)(2).
27
28
1
2
3
4
The Court finds it appropriate in this matter for Custody Staff Defendants to file a
written answer to the Third Amended Complaint by no later than March 8, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 22, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?