Ayala v. Ayers et al
Filing
72
Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding. Case did not settle. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 9/7/12. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
REYNALDO AYALA,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v
15
ROBERY AYERS, Jr. , et al.,
Case No C 10-979 JSW
REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER
EARLY SETTLEMENT
PROCEEDING
Defendants.
16
17
18
A settlement conference in this matter was held on September 4, 2012 in San
19
20
Francisco. The results of that proceeding are indicated below:
21
(1)
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the
proceeding, each possessing the requisite settlement authority:
:
Plaintiff on telephone, and Plaintiff’s counsel in San Francisco Deanna Kwong
and Tess A. Hamilton
9 Warden or warden’s representative
: Office of the California Attorney General, Erin Sullivan in San Francisco
: Other: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kaye Bassett
1
2
(2)
The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear:
3
(3)
The outcome of the proceeding was:
4
5
9 The case has been completely settled.
9 The case has been partially resolved and, on or before
6
_______________________, counsel for defendants shall file a joint stipulation specifying
7
those claims which have been resolved and those that remain to be resolved by the Court.
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9 The parties agree to an additional follow up settlement on
______________________________________________________________________.
:
The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.
Date: 9/5/12
_______________________________
Nandor J Vadas
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?