Reynoso et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 102

ORDER DIRECTING MEET-AND-CONFER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITHIN 7 DAYS (SEE ATTACHED) (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 4/20/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MALAQUIAS REYNOSO, et al.,

No. C 10-00984 MEJ (LB)

12
Plaintiff(s),
ORDER RE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

13
v.
14
15

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,

16

Defendant(s).

17

___________________________________/

18

Judge James issued a scheduling order that sets the filing deadline for summary judgment

19

motions for July 11, 2013. See ECF No. 101. That means any opposition is due by July 25, 2013

20

under the local rules. The hearing is on August 15, 2013. Id.

21

The parties previously contemplated a settlement conference with the undersigned after the

22

government filed its summary judgment motions so that Plaintiffs could have the benefit of them

23

before the settlement conference. See Order, ECF No. 90 at 2. Plaintiffs suggested that they might

24

want to have the settlement conference before they file their opposition. That means that the

25

settlement conference likely should happen during the week of July 22, 2013.

26

Accordingly, the undersigned directs the parties to meet and confer within one week about

27

scheduling and then schedule a settlement conference with courtroom deputy Lashanda Scott on a

28

date that they agree will be most productive. Updated settlement conference statements with only

ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
C 10-00984 MEJ (LB)

1

new information (and no regurgitation of old information) are due one week before and must comply

2

with the procedures set forth in the court’s previous orders. Also, Plaintiffs’ counsel is directed to

3

review with his clients personally the discovery and summary judgment motions before he submits

4

his updated settlement conference statement. As soon as possible, but in any event, no later than the

5

submission of the statement, Plaintiffs must provide a new demand to Defendants. As soon as

6

possible, but in any event, no later than 2 days before the settlement conference, Defendants must

7

respond with a specific dollar amount to Plaintiffs.

8

Submissions may be made by email to the court’s orders box at [e-mail].

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10

Dated: April 20, 2013
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
C 10-00984 MEJ (LB)

2