Reynoso et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 102


Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MALAQUIAS REYNOSO, et al., No. C 10-00984 MEJ (LB) 12 Plaintiff(s), ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 13 v. 14 15 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., 16 Defendant(s). 17 ___________________________________/ 18 Judge James issued a scheduling order that sets the filing deadline for summary judgment 19 motions for July 11, 2013. See ECF No. 101. That means any opposition is due by July 25, 2013 20 under the local rules. The hearing is on August 15, 2013. Id. 21 The parties previously contemplated a settlement conference with the undersigned after the 22 government filed its summary judgment motions so that Plaintiffs could have the benefit of them 23 before the settlement conference. See Order, ECF No. 90 at 2. Plaintiffs suggested that they might 24 want to have the settlement conference before they file their opposition. That means that the 25 settlement conference likely should happen during the week of July 22, 2013. 26 Accordingly, the undersigned directs the parties to meet and confer within one week about 27 scheduling and then schedule a settlement conference with courtroom deputy Lashanda Scott on a 28 date that they agree will be most productive. Updated settlement conference statements with only ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE C 10-00984 MEJ (LB) 1 new information (and no regurgitation of old information) are due one week before and must comply 2 with the procedures set forth in the court’s previous orders. Also, Plaintiffs’ counsel is directed to 3 review with his clients personally the discovery and summary judgment motions before he submits 4 his updated settlement conference statement. As soon as possible, but in any event, no later than the 5 submission of the statement, Plaintiffs must provide a new demand to Defendants. As soon as 6 possible, but in any event, no later than 2 days before the settlement conference, Defendants must 7 respond with a specific dollar amount to Plaintiffs. 8 Submissions may be made by email to the court’s orders box at 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: April 20, 2013 LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE C 10-00984 MEJ (LB) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?