Reynoso et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
90
ORDER vacating settlement conf on 1/11/13, resetting it to 1/24/13 at 11:00 a.m., and setting forth parties' agreements about consent to Judge James, discovery to be completed, new dates for summary judgment, and deadline for submitting stipulation to Judge Illston this week. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 1/8/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MALAQUIAS REYNOSO, et al.,
No. C 10-00984 SI (LB)
12
Plaintiff(s),
ORDER FOLLOWING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
13
v.
14
15
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
16
Defendant(s).
17
___________________________________/
18
The undersigned held a preliminary settlement conference today with the attorneys. The case
19
currently is assigned to Judge Illston. Motions are due Friday, January 11, 2013, the opposition is
20
due Friday, January 25, 2013, the dispositive motions date is February 15, 2013, and the trial is
21
April 1, 2013, see 3/7/12 Scheduling Order, ECF No. 77, and a new lawyer, Keith Oliver, is now
22
representing the Reynosos as of this week. The parties have a settlement conference set for Friday,
23
January 11, 2013, at 10:30 a.m.
24
The parties reached the following agreements going forward about the process, and the
25
undersigned said that it would issue this order to memorialize the agreements. First, they will
26
consent to Magistrate Judge James and file that this week. Second, the parties reached an agreement
27
to vacate the settlement conference and reset it to Thursday, January 24, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. to allow
28
them to finish the Reynosos’ depositions and conduct the deposition of Ms. Lakalakala. Fact
ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
C 10-00984 SI (LB)
1
discovery is otherwise closed. Third, the parties agreed that the government’s summary judgment
2
motions (City and County of San Francisco and the United States) will be filed on Tuesday, January
3
22, 2013 so that Plaintiffs may have the benefit of them before the settlement conference. The
4
opposition is due February 5, 2013, and the reply is due February 12, 2013. The government will
5
notice the motions on Judge James’ first available motions calendar, which on the five-week
6
schedule should be Thursday, February 28, 2013. Fourth, the parties will submit these scheduling
7
issues and their consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction to Judge Illston this week so that the case
8
may be reassigned..
9
The court directs Plaintiffs’ counsel to comply with the court’s previous orders to review all
settlement conference. Plaintiffs must provide a new demand to Defendants as soon as possible but
12
For the Northern District of California
settlement papers, the discovery, and the summary judgment motions with Plaintiffs before the
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
in any event, no later than Wednesday, January 23, 2013 at noon (and email a copy to the court’s
13
orders box at lbpo@cand.uscourts.gov). Defendants must respond with a demand as soon as
14
possible after that and no later than 5 p.m. that day (and email a copy to the court). All parties must
15
email a costs-and-fees-to-date update to the court’s orders box by January 23 at noon, and they may
16
submit any update to the court at the same time. The parties should not reiterate anything in the
17
previously-filed papers because the court already read those.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
Dated: January 8, 2013
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
C 10-00984 SI (LB)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?