Reynoso et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 90

ORDER vacating settlement conf on 1/11/13, resetting it to 1/24/13 at 11:00 a.m., and setting forth parties' agreements about consent to Judge James, discovery to be completed, new dates for summary judgment, and deadline for submitting stipulation to Judge Illston this week. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 1/8/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MALAQUIAS REYNOSO, et al.,

No. C 10-00984 SI (LB)

12
Plaintiff(s),
ORDER FOLLOWING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

13
v.
14
15

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,

16

Defendant(s).

17

___________________________________/

18

The undersigned held a preliminary settlement conference today with the attorneys. The case

19

currently is assigned to Judge Illston. Motions are due Friday, January 11, 2013, the opposition is

20

due Friday, January 25, 2013, the dispositive motions date is February 15, 2013, and the trial is

21

April 1, 2013, see 3/7/12 Scheduling Order, ECF No. 77, and a new lawyer, Keith Oliver, is now

22

representing the Reynosos as of this week. The parties have a settlement conference set for Friday,

23

January 11, 2013, at 10:30 a.m.

24

The parties reached the following agreements going forward about the process, and the

25

undersigned said that it would issue this order to memorialize the agreements. First, they will

26

consent to Magistrate Judge James and file that this week. Second, the parties reached an agreement

27

to vacate the settlement conference and reset it to Thursday, January 24, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. to allow

28

them to finish the Reynosos’ depositions and conduct the deposition of Ms. Lakalakala. Fact

ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
C 10-00984 SI (LB)

1

discovery is otherwise closed. Third, the parties agreed that the government’s summary judgment

2

motions (City and County of San Francisco and the United States) will be filed on Tuesday, January

3

22, 2013 so that Plaintiffs may have the benefit of them before the settlement conference. The

4

opposition is due February 5, 2013, and the reply is due February 12, 2013. The government will

5

notice the motions on Judge James’ first available motions calendar, which on the five-week

6

schedule should be Thursday, February 28, 2013. Fourth, the parties will submit these scheduling

7

issues and their consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction to Judge Illston this week so that the case

8

may be reassigned..

9

The court directs Plaintiffs’ counsel to comply with the court’s previous orders to review all

settlement conference. Plaintiffs must provide a new demand to Defendants as soon as possible but

12
For the Northern District of California

settlement papers, the discovery, and the summary judgment motions with Plaintiffs before the

11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

in any event, no later than Wednesday, January 23, 2013 at noon (and email a copy to the court’s

13

orders box at [e-mail]). Defendants must respond with a demand as soon as

14

possible after that and no later than 5 p.m. that day (and email a copy to the court). All parties must

15

email a costs-and-fees-to-date update to the court’s orders box by January 23 at noon, and they may

16

submit any update to the court at the same time. The parties should not reiterate anything in the

17

previously-filed papers because the court already read those.

18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19

Dated: January 8, 2013
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
C 10-00984 SI (LB)

2