Williams v. Miller

Filing 59

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT PROCEEDINGS 56 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/8/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

GERRY WILLIAMS,

9

Plaintiff,

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C 10-1005 SI (pr)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PROCEEDINGS

v.
C/O T. MILLER,
Defendant.
/

13
14

Plaintiff has filed a motion for a continuance of defendant's motion for summary

15

judgment so that he may conduct discovery and prepare a response. Upon due consideration,

16

plaintiff's motion for a continuance is DENIED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). (Docket # 56.)

17

The court now extends the deadlines for the pending motion for summary judgment:

18

Plaintiff must file and serve his opposition to the motion for summary judgment no later than

19

December 7, 2012. By the time this deadline arrives, plaintiff will have had more than three

20

months to prepare his opposition, and no further extensions of this deadline will be granted.

21

Failure to file the opposition by the deadline will result in the motion being treated as

22

unopposed. Defendant must file and serve his reply, if any, no later than December 14, 2012.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 8, 2012

_______________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge