Dell Inc. et al v. Sharp Corporation et al

Filing 15

ORDER re: scheduling in C-10-1064 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2010)

Dell Inc. et al v. Sharp Corporation et al

Doc. 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, L E W I S & B O C K I U S LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP KENT M. ROGER, State Bar No, 95987 HERMAN J. HOYING, State Bar No. 257495 MICHELLE KIM-SZROM, State Bar No. 252901 One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

DELL INC. and DELL PRODUCTS L.P., Plaintiffs, v. SHARP CORPORATION; SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.; HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.; HITACHI, LTD.; EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION; EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.; TOSHIBA CORPORATION; and TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD., Defendants.

Case No. 3:10-CV-01064 SI MDL No. 1827 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING

28
DB2/21806940.1 CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4

WHEREAS plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. (collectively, "Dell") filed the above captioned lawsuit on March 12, 2010; WHEREAS Dell filed a Notice of Related Case to In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation, Case No. M:07-CV-1827-SI, MDL No. 1827, on March 12, 2010, and the case was

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, L E W I S & B O C K I U S LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO

reassigned to the Honorable Susan Illston on March 18, 2010; WHEREAS, the Defendants have agreed to waive service and the parties have reached an agreement, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), to extend the time within which the Defendants must move against, answer or otherwise respond to Dell's Complaint; WHEREAS, the Parties previously stipulated and the Court ordered (Dkt. 1801) Defendants to move against, answer or otherwise respond to Dell's Complaint by July 6, 2010. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Dell, on the one hand, and defendants Sharp Corporation; Sharp Electronics Corporation; Hitachi Displays, Ltd.; Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.; Hitachi, Ltd.; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; Epson Electronics America, Inc; Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.; Toshiba Corporation; and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Defendants") on the other hand, as follows: 1. Defendants will have until July 16, 2010, to move against, answer or otherwise respond to Dell's Complaint. 2. Dell and Defendants agree to the following briefing schedule for any motion or motions to dismiss Dell's Complaint (the "Motions") and agree to file all motions or proposed orders as necessary to implement the agreed-upon schedule. To the extent the Court does not accept all or any part of the proposed schedule, Dell and

28 -2CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

DB2/21806940.1

1 2 3 4

Defendants agree to work in good faith to establish a briefing schedule for the Motions acceptable to all parties and the Court to replace that set forth below: a. Dell will have until August 24, 2010 to file any response to the Motions; b. Defendants will have until September 23, 2010 to file any reply brief(s) to

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, L E W I S & B O C K I U S LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO

the Motions; c. The hearing on the Motions will be noticed for October 7, 2010. 3. Except as set forth above, all Local Rules shall remain in effect with respect to the briefing on the Motions. Entering into this stipulation does not effect a waiver of any defense under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. This stipulation does not constitute a waiver of any challenge to personal jurisdiction by any Defendant. Dated: July 1, 2010 /s/ Kent M. Roger Kent M. Roger [e-mail] Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. /s/ John Chung John H. Chung (PRO HAC VICE) White & Case LLP 1155 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-2787 [phone] Attorneys for Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd.

28 -3CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

DB2/21806940.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, L E W I S & B O C K I U S LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO

/s/ Colin C. West Colin C. West [e-mail] Bingham McCutchen LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111 [phone] [phone] (Fax) Attorneys for Defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation /s/ Jacob R. Sorensen Jacob R. Sorensen (State Bar No. 209134) Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 50 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation /s/ Stephen P. Freccero Stephen P. Freccero [e-mail] Morrison & Foerster LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc.

28 -4CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

DB2/21806940.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, L E W I S & B O C K I U S LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO

/s/ Debra D. Bernstein Steven D. Hemminger (SBN 110665) [e-mail] Alston + Bird LLP Two Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400 Palo Alto, California 94306 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Michael P. Kenny, Esq. [e-mail] Debra D. Bernstein, Esq. [e-mail] Rodney J. Ganske, Esq. [e-mail] Elizabeth H. Jordan, Esq. [e-mail] Matthew D. Kent, Esq. [e-mail] Alston + Bird LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. FILER'S ATTESTATION I, Kent M. Roger, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that John Chung, Colin West, Jacob R. Sorensen, Steven P. Freccero, and Debra Bernstein concur in this filing. /s/ Kent M. Roger Kent M. Roger Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., and Hitachi, Ltd.

28 -5CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

DB2/21806940.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, L E W I S & B O C K I U S LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO

[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the parties' stipulation set forth above and pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Civil Local Rules, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:

By HON. SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28 -6CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

DB2/21806940.1