Dell Inc. et al v. Sharp Corporation et al

Filing 443

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re 442 Notice of Motion/Stipulation Filed in MDL Master Case, filed by Dell Products, L.P., Dell Inc., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd. and Chi Mei Innolux Corporation terminated.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/17/12. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Michael P. Kenny ([e-mail])
Debra D. Bernstein ([e-mail])
Rodney J. Ganske ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Douglas R. Young ([e-mail])
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P.
[Additional Counsel Listed On Signature Page]

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

16
17
18

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MASTER CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MQ
MDL NO. 1827

DELL INC. and DELL PRODUCTS L.P.,

Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-01064 SI

19
20
21
22

Plaintiffs,

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

23
24
25

Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. (collectively, “Dell”) and Defendants Chimei

26

Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation), Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.,

27

CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc. (collectively,

28

“CMI”), by and through undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree that Dell hereby dismisses with
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Master File No. M07-1827 SI
3:10-cv-01064 SI

1

prejudice all claims being asserted against CMI in the above-captioned action pursuant to Rule

2

41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this stipulation of dismissal, the parties

3

state as follows:

4

1.

Dell and CMI seek the dismissal of this action with prejudice.

5

2.

This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims Dell may have against any other

6
7
8
9

defendant or co-conspirator in this litigation.
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court issue the Proposed Order of
Dismissal.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Master File No. M07-1827 SI
3:10-cv-01064 SI

1
2

DATED: December 17, 2012

3

Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Rodney J. Ganske
Michael P. Kenny, Esq.
Debra D. Bernstein, Esq.
Rodney J. Ganske, Esq.
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424
Tel: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Douglas R. Young
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15

Kimball R. Anderson, Esq.
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
35 West Wacker Dr.
Chicago, Illinois 60601-9703
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

16
17
18
19

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products
L.P.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Master File No. M07-1827 SI
3:10-cv-01064 SI

1 DATED: December 17, 2012
2

By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV
James G. Kreissman, Esq.
Harrison J. Frahn IV, Esq.
SIMPSON THATCHER & BARTLETT LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendants Chimei Innolux
Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics
Corporation), Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.,
CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., and
Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.

8
9
10
11

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of

12

this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Master File No. M07-1827 SI
3:10-cv-01064 SI

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Michael P. Kenny ([e-mail])
Debra D. Bernstein ([e-mail])
Rodney J. Ganske ([e-mail])
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Douglas R. Young ([e-mail])
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

15
16
17

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MASTER CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MQ
MDL NO. 1827

DELL INC. and DELL PRODUCTS L.P.,

Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-01064 SI

18
19
20
21

Plaintiffs,

PROPOSED ORDER

v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

22
23
24
25

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore,
orders as follows:

26

1. All claims asserted by Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. against Chimei Innolux Corporation

27

(f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation), Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO

28
PROPOSED ORDER

Master File No. M07-1827 SI
3:10-cv-01064 SI

1

Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc. in the

2

underlying action are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2).

3

2. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

December 17
Dated: _________________ , 2012

7

_______________________________
Honorable Susan Y. Illston
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROPOSED ORDER

Master File No. M07-1827 SI
3:10-cv-01064 SI