Dell Inc. et al v. Sharp Corporation et al

Filing 450

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 449 Notice of Motion/Stipulation Filed in MDL Master Case filed by Dell Products, L.P., Dell Inc., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 449 Notice of Motion/Stipulation Filed in MDL Master Case. Motions in Limine due by 1/7/2013; Oppositions to Motions in Limine due by 1/11/2013.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 1/3/13. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Michael P. Kenny (mike.kenny@alston.com) Debra D. Bernstein (debra.bernstein@alston.com) Rodney J. Ganske (rod.ganske@alston.com) ALSTON + BIRD LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 Telephone: (404) 881-7000 Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 Douglas R. Young (dyoung@fbm.com) FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 235 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4410 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. [Additional Counsel Listed On Signature Page] 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 14 15 16 IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION MASTER CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MQ MDL NO. 1827 This Document Relates to Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-1064 SI Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-01064 SI DELL INC. and DELL PRODUCTS L.P., STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING REVISED PRETRIAL SCHEDULE 17 18 Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 22 v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.; Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REQUESTING REVISED PRETRIAL SCHEDULE 1 Master File No. M07-1827 SI 3:10-md-1827 SI 1 Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. (“Dell”) and Defendant HannStar Display 2 Corporation (“HannStar”) hereby stipulated and request the Court to adopt the pretrial schedule set out 3 below for the Track 1 trial set to commence on January 28, 2013 in this MDL. 4 WHEREAS, Dell has settled with all defendants other than HannStar; 5 WHEREAS, trial is set to commence on January 28, 2013; 6 WHEREAS, the pretrial conference is set for January 15, 2013; 7 THEREFORE, THE PARTIES JOINTLY MOVE for the following pretrial schedule: 8 7 1/8/13 Motions in Limine Due 10 1/11/13 Hearing on Daubert Motions at 9:00 a.m. (Dkt. No. 7124) 11 1/11/13 Plaintiffs submit Joint Pretrial Order to Court 9 12 13 All Parties to individually submit Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Verdict Form 11 1/14/13 Oppositions to Motions in Limine Due 15 1/15/13 Pretrial Conference at 3:30 p.m. (Dkt. No. 7124) 16 1/25/13 Exhibit Binders Due to Court (three sets) 1/28/13 Jury Selection; Trial 14 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REQUESTING REVISED PRETRIAL SCHEDULE 2 Master File No. M07-1827 SI 3:10-md-1827 SI 1 Dated: December 31, 2012 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 /s/ Rodney J. Ganske Michael P. Kenny, Esq. mike.kenny@alston.com Debra D. Bernstein, Esq. debra.bernstein@alston.com Rodney J. Ganske, Esq. rod.ganske@alston.com ALSTON & BIRD LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 Tel: (404) 881-7000 Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. /s/ Jason S. Angell Robert E. Freitas (SBN 80948) rfreitas@ftklaw.com Jason S. Angell (SBN 221607) jangell@ftklaw.com Jessica N. Leal (SBN 267232) jleal@ftklaw.com FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP 100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 593-6300 Facsimile: (650) 593-6301 Attorneys for Defendant HannStar Display Corporation 17 18 Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories thereto has 19 been obtained. 20 21 By: /s/ Rodney J. Ganske Rodney J. Ganske 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REQUESTING REVISED PRETRIAL SCHEDULE 3 Master File No. M07-1827 SI 3:10-md-1827 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 January 2013 3 DATED this ___ day of __________________, ____. 4 5 6 By:_______________________ 7 Hon. SUSAN ILLSTON 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING PRETRIAL SCHEDULE Master File No. M07-1827 SI 3:10-md-1827 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?