Dell Inc. et al v. Sharp Corporation et al
Filing
450
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 449 Notice of Motion/Stipulation Filed in MDL Master Case filed by Dell Products, L.P., Dell Inc., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 449 Notice of Motion/Stipulation Filed in MDL Master Case. Motions in Limine due by 1/7/2013; Oppositions to Motions in Limine due by 1/11/2013.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 1/3/13. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Michael P. Kenny (mike.kenny@alston.com)
Debra D. Bernstein (debra.bernstein@alston.com)
Rodney J. Ganske (rod.ganske@alston.com)
ALSTON + BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424
Telephone: (404) 881-7000
Facsimile: (404) 881-7777
Douglas R. Young (dyoung@fbm.com)
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 954-4410
Facsimile: (415) 954-4480
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P.
[Additional Counsel Listed On Signature Page]
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)
14
15
16
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
MASTER CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MQ
MDL NO. 1827
This Document Relates to Individual
Case No. 3:10-cv-1064 SI
Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-01064 SI
DELL INC. and DELL PRODUCTS L.P.,
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER REQUESTING REVISED
PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
17
18
Plaintiffs,
19
20
21
22
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.;
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REQUESTING REVISED PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
1
Master File No. M07-1827 SI
3:10-md-1827 SI
1
Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. (“Dell”) and Defendant HannStar Display
2
Corporation (“HannStar”) hereby stipulated and request the Court to adopt the pretrial schedule set out
3
below for the Track 1 trial set to commence on January 28, 2013 in this MDL.
4
WHEREAS, Dell has settled with all defendants other than HannStar;
5
WHEREAS, trial is set to commence on January 28, 2013;
6
WHEREAS, the pretrial conference is set for January 15, 2013;
7
THEREFORE, THE PARTIES JOINTLY MOVE for the following pretrial schedule:
8
7
1/8/13
Motions in Limine Due
10
1/11/13
Hearing on Daubert Motions at 9:00 a.m. (Dkt. No. 7124)
11
1/11/13
Plaintiffs submit Joint Pretrial Order to Court
9
12
13
All Parties to individually submit Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Verdict Form
11
1/14/13
Oppositions to Motions in Limine Due
15
1/15/13
Pretrial Conference at 3:30 p.m. (Dkt. No. 7124)
16
1/25/13
Exhibit Binders Due to Court (three sets)
1/28/13
Jury Selection; Trial
14
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REQUESTING REVISED PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
2
Master File No. M07-1827 SI
3:10-md-1827 SI
1
Dated: December 31, 2012
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
/s/ Rodney J. Ganske
Michael P. Kenny, Esq.
mike.kenny@alston.com
Debra D. Bernstein, Esq.
debra.bernstein@alston.com
Rodney J. Ganske, Esq.
rod.ganske@alston.com
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424
Tel: (404) 881-7000
Facsimile: (404) 881-7777
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P.
/s/ Jason S. Angell
Robert E. Freitas (SBN 80948)
rfreitas@ftklaw.com
Jason S. Angell (SBN 221607)
jangell@ftklaw.com
Jessica N. Leal (SBN 267232)
jleal@ftklaw.com
FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone:
(650) 593-6300
Facsimile:
(650) 593-6301
Attorneys for Defendant HannStar Display Corporation
17
18
Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories thereto has
19
been obtained.
20
21
By:
/s/ Rodney J. Ganske
Rodney J. Ganske
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REQUESTING REVISED PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
3
Master File No. M07-1827 SI
3:10-md-1827 SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
January
2013
3
DATED this ___ day of __________________, ____.
4
5
6
By:_______________________
7
Hon. SUSAN ILLSTON
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
Master File No. M07-1827 SI
3:10-md-1827 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?