Dell Inc. et al v. Sharp Corporation et al

Filing 66

ORDER Re: 61 and 2889 extension to response to amended complaint (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
KENT M. ROGER, State Bar No, 95987
HERMAN J. HOYING, State Bar No. 257495
JENNIFER L. CALVERT, State Bar No. 258018
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.,
HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

13
14

DELL INC. and DELL PRODUCTS L.P.,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Case No. 3:10-CV-01064 SI
MDL No. 1827

Plaintiffs,
v.
SHARP CORPORATION; SHARP
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION;
HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.; HITACHI
ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.;
HITACHI, LTD.; EPSON IMAGING
DEVICES CORPORATION; EPSON
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.;
HANNSTAR DISPLAY
CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA
ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.;
TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION
SYSTEMS, INC.; TOSHIBA
CORPORATION; and TOSHIBA
MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD.,

25

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants.

26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
S A N F R A N CIS CO

DB2/22480886.1

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3

WHEREAS plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. (collectively, “Dell”) filed the
above captioned lawsuit on March 12, 2010;
WHEREAS Dell filed a first amended complaint on April 8, 2011 (“Amended

4
Complaint”);
5
6

WHEREAS Defendants Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

7

and Hitachi, Ltd. (collectively, the “Hitachi Defendants”) and Defendants Sharp Corporation and

8

Sharp Electronics Corporation, filed a motion to dismiss Count Six of the Amended Complaint

9

alleging violations of New York’s Donnelly Act claims on April 22, 2011;

10
11

WHEREAS the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Count Six of the Amended
Complaint on May 17, 2011;

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

WHEREAS the Hitachi Defendants’ deadline to respond to Dell’s Amended Complaint
currently is June 10, 2011;
WHEREAS extending the Hitachi Defendants’ time to respond to the Amended
Complaint will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by the Court;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the
undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Dell, on the one hand, and the Hitachi
Defendants on the other hand, as follows:

20
21
22

1. Hitachi Defendants will have until July 11, 2011 to answer Dell’s Amended
Complaint.

23
24
25
26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
S A N F R A N CIS CO

DB2/22480886.1

-2-

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Dated: June 9, 2011
/s/ Kent M. Roger
Kent M. Roger (SBN 95987)
Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays,
Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

7

/s/ Debra D. Bernstein
Michael P. Kenny, Esq.
Georgia Bar No. 415064
[e-mail]
Debra D. Bernstein, Esq.
Georgia Bar No. 054998
[e-mail]
Rodney J. Ganske, Esq.
Georgia Bar No. 283819
[e-mail]
Elizabeth H. Jordan, Esq.
Georgia Bar No. 415161
[e-mail]
Matthew D. Kent, Esq.
Georgia Bar No. 526272
[e-mail]
Alston + Bird LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Steven D. Hemminger (SBN 110665)
[e-mail]
Alston + Bird LLP
Two Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400
Palo Alto, California 94306
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

21
22
23
24
25

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell
Products L.P.

26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
S A N F R A N CIS CO

DB2/22480886.1

-3-

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

FILER’S ATTESTATION

2

I, Kent M. Roger, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file

3

this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby

4

attest that Debra Bernstein concurs in this filing.

5

/s/ Kent M. Roger
Kent M. Roger
Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays,
Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
S A N F R A N CIS CO

DB2/22480886.1

-4-

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation set forth above and pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Civil
Local Rules, IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

20
Dated: June ___, 2011

6
By

7

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
S A N F R A N CIS CO

DB2/22480886.1

-5-

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER