Harris v. City of Oakland et al
Filing
7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The clerk is directed to terminate all motions and close the file. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2010)
<![CDATA[
Harris v. City of Oakland et al
Doc. 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. On July 6, 2010, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and warned plaintiff that failure to respond would result in dismissal. Doc #5. Plaintiff failed to respond to the order, and TYRONE L HARRIS, Plaintiff, v CITY OF OAKLAND, WAYNE G TUCKER, MARCO MARQUEZ, STEVEN MARTIN JR, Defendants. / No C 10-1083 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
the deadline for doing so, August 2, 2010, has passed. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED pursuant to FRCP 41(b). clerk is directed to terminate all motions and close the file. The
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
