Areiqat v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 48

ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 46 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Patrick Griffin, Joseph Valdez, Victor Hui, Hanan Areiqat, City and County of San Francisco, Elmer Najarro, John Burke, Hadeel Areiqat, Kevin Rightmire, Josh Hinds, David Albright. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/20/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961
Chief Trial Deputy
BLAKE P. LOEBS, State Bar #145790
Chief of Civil Rights Litigation
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
JOHN BURKE, PATRICK GRIFFIN, VICTOR HUI,
ELMER NAJARRO, JOSEPH VALDEZ, JOSH HINDS
and KEVIN RIGHTMIRE

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

HANAN AREIQAT AND HADEEL
AREIQAT,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Case No. C10-1113 EMC

Plaintiff,
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

vs.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO; JOHN BURKE, Star #2240,
individually and in his capacity as a San
Francisco police officer; VICTOR HUI, Star
#1370, individually and in his capacity as a
San Francisco police officer; DAVID
ALBRIGHT, Star #104, individually and in his
capacity as a San Francisco police officer;
JOSEPH VALDEZ, Star #4228, individually
and in his capacity as a San Francisco police
officer; PATRICK GRIFFIN, Star #1835,
individually and in his capacity as a San
Francisco police officer; ELMER NAJARRO,
Star #1078, individually and in his capacity as
a San Francisco police officer and DOES 1-30,

Trial Date:

NONE

Defendants.

25
26
27
28
Request for Dismissal; [PROPOSED] Order of
Dismissal; CASE NO. C10-1113 EMC

1

n:\lit\li2010\100154\00754250.doc

1
2

TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT:
On March 16, 2010, Plaintiffs individually appeared and Blake Loebs appeared on behalf of all

3

defendants for the Order to Show Cause for why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to

4

prosecute. Plaintiffs stated that they wanted to have the case dismissed, with all parties to bear their

5

own costs and Defendants agreed.

6
7

Pursuant to the request of the parties, this matter should be dismissed with prejudice. Each
party to bear their own costs.

8
9

Dated: March 19, 2012
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
JOANNE HOEPER
Chief Trial Deputy
BLAKE P. LOEBS
Chief of Civil Rights Litigation

10
11
12
13
By:

14
15

/s/ Blake P. Loebs
BLAKE P. LOEBS
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

17

20
DATED:

3/20/12

21

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

Chen
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
ard M.
UNITED STATES DISTRICTEdw
dge COURT JUDGE
Ju

RT

23
24
25

A

H

ER

LI

NO

22

R NIA

UNIT
ED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

19

S

ORDER

18

FO

16

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27
28
Request for Dismissal; [PROPOSED] Order of
Dismissal; CASE NO. C10-1113 EMC

2

n:\lit\li2010\100154\00754250.doc