Ries et al v. Hornell Brewing Company, inc. et al

Filing 163

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 162 EXTENDING HEARING SCHEDULE AND DUE DATE FOR ALL PRETRIAL MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/10/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY & CARPENTER, LLP ROBERT P. DONOVAN (pro hac vice) rdonovan@mdmc-law.com LEWIS H. GOLDFARB (pro hac vice ) lgoldfarb@mdmc-law.com Three Gateway Center 100 Mulberry Street Newark, New Jersey 07102 Telephone: (973) 622-7711 Facsimile: (973) 622-5314 7 8 9 10 SEDGWICK LLP KEVIN J. DUNNE Bar No. 40030 kevin.dunne@sedgwicklaw.com 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 781-7900 Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants ARIZONA BEVERAGES USA LLC, HORNELL BREWING CO., INC. d/b/a FEROLITO, VULTAGGIO & SONS, INC., and BEVERAGE MARKETING USA, INC. 14 15 16 17 18 BAKER LAW PC G. RICHARD BAKER (SBN: 224003) richard@bakerlawpc.com 612 32nd Street South, #213 Birmingham, Alabama 35233 Telephone: (205) 201-2328 Facsimile: (800) 886-6556 JACKSON & TUCKER PC JOSEPH L. TUCKER (pro hac vice) josh@jacksonandtucker.com 2229 First Avenue North Birmingham, Alabama 35203 Telephone: (205) 252-3535 Facsimile: (205) 252-3536 DL LAW GROUP DAVID M. LILIENSTEIN (SBN: 218923) david@dllawgroup.com 345 Franklin Street San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (415) 271-7169 Facsimile: (415) 358-8484 WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A. KEVIN P. RODDY (State Bar No. 128283) DANIEL R. LAPINSKI (pro hac vice) kroddy@wilentz.com dlapinski@wilentz.com 90 Woodbridge Center Drive, Suite 900 Woodbridge, NJ 07095 Telephone: (732) 636-8000 Facsimile: (732) 726-6686 Attorneys for Plaintiffs LAUREN RIES and SERENA ALGOZER 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LAUREN RIES and SERENA ALGOZER, Individuals on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HORNELL BREWING COMPANY, INC., et al., CASE NO. CV 10-01139 RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING HEARING SCHEDULE AND DUE DATE FOR ALL PRETRIAL MOTIONS Defendants. 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING HEARING SCHEDULE AND DUE DATE FOR ALL PRETRIAL MOTIONS CASE NO. CV 10-01139 RS 1 TO THE COURT, AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 THIS STIPULATION, entered into by and between plaintiffs, Lauren Ries and Serena 3 Algozer (“Plaintiffs”), and defendants, Hornell Brewing Co, Inc., d/b/a Ferolito, Vultaggio & 4 Sons, Inc., Beverage Marketing USA., Inc., and Arizona Beverages USA LLC (collectively, 5 “Defendants”), hereby respectfully request an extension of the hearing schedule and due date for 6 all pretrial motions set forth in the Case Management Scheduling Order [DE 110]. 7 The parties jointly propose the following schedule: 8 The hearing date for all pretrial motions shall be extended so that all such motions shall 9 10 be filed so as to be heard no later than March 14, 2013. IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD: 11 12 DATED: December 6, 2012 s/ Robert P. Donovan Robert P. Donovan (pro hac vice) McELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY & CARPENTER, LLP Attorneys for Defendants DATED: December 6, 2012 s/ Kevin J. Dunne Kevin J. Dunne Andrew J. King SEDGWICK LLP Attorneys for Defendants DATED: December 6, 2012 s/ Daniel R. Lapinski Daniel R. Lapinski WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING HEARING SCHEDULE AND DUE DATE FOR ALL PRETRIAL MOTIONS CASE NO. CV 10-01139 RS 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 12/10 DATED: _________________, 2012 5 __________________________________________ THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 #1877919 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING HEARING SCHEDULE AND DUE DATE FOR ALL PRETRIAL MOTIONS CASE NO. CV 10-01139 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?