Zeisel v. Diamond Foods, Inc.
Filing
163
ORDER GRANTING 160 Stipulated Request Amending June 13, 2011 Order Scheduling Trial and Pretrial Matters. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/30/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2011)
Case3:10-cv-01192-JSW Document160
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802
Winston & Strawn LLP
10
Jeffrey J. Lederman (SBN: 104622)
jlederman@winston.com
Jeffrey S. Bosley (SBN: 167629)
jbosley@winston.com
Amanda L. Groves (SBN: 187216)
agroves@winston.com
Lindsay C. Llewellyn (SBN: 257936)
lcllewellyn@winston.com
Sean D. Meenan (SBN: 260466)
smeenan@winston.com
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802
Telephone:
(415) 591-1000
Facsimile:
(415) 591-1400
Attorneys for Defendant
DIAMOND FOODS, INC.
11
Filed08/29/11 Page1 of 3
Joseph N. Kravec, Jr. (admitted pro hac vice)
STEMBER FEINSTEIN DOYLE
& PAYNE, LLC
429 Forbes Avenue, 17th Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Tel: (412) 281-8400
Fax: (412) 281-1007
Email: jkravec@stemberfeinstein.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
ELLIOT ZEISEL
Janet Lindner Spielberg (Bar No. 221926)
LAW OFFICE OF JANET LINDNER
SPIELBERG
12400 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Tel: (310) 392-8801
Fax: (310) 278-5938
Email: jlspielberg@jlslp.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
ELLIOT ZEISEL
12
13
Michael D. Braun (Bar No. 167416)
BRAUN LAW GROUP, P.C.
10680 W. Pico Blvd., Suite 280
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Tel: (310) 836-6000
Fax: (310) 836-6010
Email: service@braunlawgroup.com
14
15
16
17
Counsel for Plaintiff
ELLIOT ZEISEL
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
22
23
24
25
ELLIOT ZEISEL, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
26
DIAMOND FOODS, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
27
Case No. 3:10-cv-01192 JSW (EDL)
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING
JUNE 13, 2011 ORDER SCHEDULING
TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS
Defendant.
Date Complaint Filed: March 22, 2010
28
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS
Case No. 3:10-CV-01192 JSW (EDL)
Case3:10-cv-01192-JSW Document160
1
Filed08/29/11 Page2 of 3
Pursuant to this Court’s Civil Standing Orders, October 19, 2010 Order Scheduling Trial and
2
Pretrial Matters, February 3, 2011 Order Amending October 19, 2010 Order Scheduling Trial and
3
Pretrial Matters, June 13, 2011 Order Amending February 3, 2011 Order Scheduling Trial and
4
Pretrial Matters, and Civil Local Rules 6-2, 7-1(a) and 7-12, Plaintiff Elliot Zeisel (“Plaintiff”) and
5
Defendant Diamond Foods, Inc. (“Diamond”) (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree as
6
follows:
7
8
9
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2010 the Court entered its Order Scheduling Trial and Pretrial
Matters [Docket No. 41] (“October 2010 Scheduling Order”);
WHEREAS, on February 3, 2011 the Court modified the October 2010 Scheduling Order
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802
Winston & Strawn LLP
10
pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulated Request and entered its Order Amending Order Scheduling
11
Trial and Pretrial Matters [Docket No. 66] (“February 2011 Scheduling Order”);
12
WHEREAS, on June 13, 2011 the Court modified the February 2011 Scheduling Order
13
pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulated Request and entered its Order Amending Order Scheduling
14
Trial and Pretrial Matters [Docket No. 158] (“June 2011 Scheduling Order”);
15
WHEREAS, in an attempt to avoid motion practice regarding certain depositions, the Parties
16
are in the process of negotiating an agreement by which Diamond will produce additional documents
17
in lieu of certain depositions;
18
WHEREAS, the Parties have been working diligently and expeditiously to conduct fact
19
discovery in this matter, have successfully reached agreement on nearly all discovery issues to date
20
and respectfully request a two-week extension of the expert discovery and disclosure cut-off dates to
21
allow for Parties to resolve their remaining discovery disputes– mostly related to a single deposition
22
– described in the accompanying declarations;
23
24
THEREFORE, the undersigned Parties submit this stipulated request and respectfully request
the Court amend the June 2011 Scheduling Order as follows:
25
Jury Trial Date: Monday, 1/30/2012, at 8:00 a.m., 10-day estimate (no change)
26
Pretrial Conference: Monday, 1/9/2012, at 2:00 p.m. (no change)
27
Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 11/4/2011, 9:00 a.m. (no change)
28
Last Day for Expert Discovery: Friday, 11/4/2011 (previously 10/21/2011)
1
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS
Case No. 3:10-CV-01192 JSW (EDL)
Case3:10-cv-01192-JSW Document160
Filed08/29/11 Page3 of 3
1
Last Day for Expert Disclosure: Friday, 10/14/2011 (previously 9/30/2011)
2
Close of Non-Expert Discovery: Wednesday, 8/31/2011 (no change)
3
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
5
Respectfully submitted,
6
Dated: August 29, 2011
7
STEMBER FEINSTEIN DOYLE & PAYNE, LLC
By:
8
9
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802
Winston & Strawn LLP
10
Dated: August 29, 2011
11
13
_
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
By:
12
/s/ Joseph N. Kravec, Jr.
Joseph N. Kravec, Jr.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ELLIOT ZEISEL
/s/ Amanda L. Groves
Amanda L. Groves
Attorneys for Defendant
DIAMOND FOODS, INC.
14
15
16
17
18
I, Amanda L. Groves, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.
19
/s/ Amanda L. Groves
Amanda L. Groves
20
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
Dated: August 30, 2011
_______________
________________________________
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS
Case No. 3:10-CV-01192 JSW (EDL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?