Zeisel v. Diamond Foods, Inc.

Filing 194

ORDER ON FORM AND METHOD OF CLASS NOTICE; CONTINUING DEADLINES AND VACATING STATUS CONFERENCE: Hearing on MOTION for Summary Judgment set for 3/2/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Responses due by 1/13/2012. Replies due by 2/10/2012. Last Daty for Expert Discovery: 2/24/2012. Jury Trial set for 5/14/2012 08:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Pretrial Conference set for 4/23/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/13/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

ELLIOT ZEISEL, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated,

No. C 10-01192 JSW

10

ORDER ON FORM OF AND
METHOD OF CLASS NOTICE;
CONTINUING DEADLINES; AND
VACATING STATUS
CONFERENCE

11
v.
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

Plaintiffs,
12
13

DIAMOND FOODS, INC., a Delaware
corporation,

14

Defendant.
/

15
16

The Court has received and considered the parties’ Joint Status Conference Statement,

17

submitted following the Court’s Order on Plaintiff’s Motion to Approve Plan and Form of

18

Notice and Class Definition. The Court HEREBY VACATES the status conference set for

19

October 14, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. In their status report, the parties have stated that they agree to

20

the modified Class Definition proposed by the Court, with the caveat that “both parties’ rights

21

with respect to the arguments they have raised before this Court are preserved.” That caveat is

22

duly noted. Accordingly, the Court orders that the class shall be defined as follows:

23

All persons in the United States who, for personal or household use,
purchased Diamond of California Shelled Walnuts in 6oz, 10oz, 16 oz and
3lb bags from March 22, 2006 through October 13, 2011 (“the Shelled
Walnut Products”) bearing labels that say “OMEGAÆ3...2.5 g per serving”
on the front and back of the package, and “The omega-3 in walnuts can
help you get the proper balance of fatty acids your body needs form
promoting and maintaining heart health” on the back of the package (the
“Disputed Labels”). Purchasers who bought Shelled Walnut Products with
Disputed Labels for resale are not included.

24
25
26
27
28

1

The parties also have agreed that notice shall be published once in Bon Appetit, once in

status conference statement, the parties note that they intend to publish the notice in Bon Appetit

4

and Cooking Light during the holiday season, which is the time of year Defendant typically

5

advertises and is a busy time of year and, thus, likely to reach a wide number of readers. In

6

light of the fact that the parties have agreed to publish notice in both magazines and in U.S.A.

7

Today, the Court’s concerns are satisfied, and it concludes that the method of notice is the best

8

notice practicable under the circumstances. The parties also have resolved their disputes on

9

timing. The parties argue that the Court set an opt-out deadline of February 15, 2012, which is

10

45 days after the last date on which notice would be published in Cooking Light. In its previous

11
For the Northern District of California

Cooking Light, and once in USA Today, and by a distribution of a newswire release. In their

3

United States District Court

2

order, the Court noted that it would require at least 45 days. In light of the fact that the parties

12

are going to publish notice during the holiday season, which the parties themselves

13

acknowledge is a busy time of year, the Court ORDERS that the opt-out deadline shall be

14

February 29, 2012.

15
16
17

In light of the Court’s ruling regarding the opt-out deadline, the Court modifies, in part,
the parties’ proposed scheduling order as follows:

20

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment:
1/13/12
Last Date for Expert Disclosure:
1/27/12
Defendant’s Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment:
2/10/12
Last Day for Expert Discovery:
2/24/12
Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment:
3/2/12 9:00 a.m.
Pretrial Conference:
4/23/12 2:00 p.m.
Trial:
5/14/12 8:00 a.m.

21

With respect to the form of notice, although the Court expresses no opinion on the

18
19

22

admissibility of the FDA Warning Letter, the Court concludes that the disputed paragraph at p.

23

3 of the Long Form Notice should be removed.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 13, 2011
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27
28
2

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3