Stewart et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP

Filing 54

ORDER granting exention of time to respond to complaint (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

David C. Powell (SBN 129781)
Email: [e-mail]
David S. Reidy (SBN 225904)
Email: [e-mail]
Amy Lifson-Leu (SBN 260062)
Email: [e-mail]
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10
11

WILLIAM G. STEWART AND NANCY
STEWART,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

vs.
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, and
Does 1 - 100,

Civil Action No. CV 10-01225SI
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANT BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT; and
[PROPOSED] ORDER

15
Defendants.
16
17

Compl. Filed:
Trial Date:

March 24, 2010
None

Honorable Susan Illston

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–1–
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1
STIPULATION

2

WHEREAS, on April 15, 2011, Plaintiffs William Stewart and Nancy Stewart filed a First

3
4

Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS, according to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, the deadline for Defendant

5
6

BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP to respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint is May 2, 2011;

7

and

8
9

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10
11
12

WHEREAS, Defendant believes that an additional week is needed to adequately respond to
the First Amended Complaint; and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that Defendant may have until May 9, 2011 to respond to the
First Amended Complaint;
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant, through their

13

undersigned counsel of record, that good cause exists to continue the deadline for Defendant to

14

respond to the First Amended Complaint from May 2, 2011 by approximately 7 days, and the parties

15

therefore request such a continuance.

16

SO STIPULATED:

17

DATED: April 28, 2011

REED SMITH LLP

18
By
19
20

/s/
David S. Reidy
Attorneys for Defendant
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP

21
22

DATED: April 28, 2011

LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM E. KENNEDY

23
24
25

By

/s/
William E. Kennedy
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
William G. Stewart and Nancy Stewart

26
27
28
–2–
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

2

I, David S. Reidy, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

3

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

4

and [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that

5

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. I declare

6

under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and

7

correct. Executed this day April 28, 2011, at San Francisco, California.

8
9

By

/s/
David S. Reidy

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–3–
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

ORDER

1
2
3
4
5

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, based on the above stipulation of the parties and good
cause appearing thereon, that the deadline for Defendant BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP to respond
May 9
to the First Amended Complaint in this action shall be continued to ________________, 2011 at
__________.

6
7

SO ORDERED:

8
9

May 2
DATED: _______________, 2011

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10
11

Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Court Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–4–
ORDER