Stewart et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP

Filing 98

STIPULATION AND ORDER CHANGING DATE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Settlement Conference reset for 2/15/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/2/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM E. KENNEDY WILLIAM E. KENNEDY (CSB #158214) 2797 Park Avenue, Suite 201 Santa Clara, California 95050 (408) 241-1000 phone (408) 241-1500 fax wkennedy@kennedyconsumerlaw.com Robert David Humphreys (OBA 12346 pro hac vice) Humphreys Wallace Humphreys, P.C. 9202 S. Toledo Avenue Tulsa, OK 74137 (918) 747-5300 Telephone (918) 747-5311 Facsimile david@hwh-law.com 12 Lucius James Wallace (OBA 16070 pro hac vice) Humphreys Wallace Humphreys, P.C. 9202 S. Toledo Avenue Tulsa, OK 74137 (918) 747-5300 Telephone (918) 747-5311 Facsimile luke@hwh-law.com 13 Attorney for Plaintiffs WILLIAM G. STEWART AND NANCY STEWART 9 10 11 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 WILLIAM G. STEWART AND NANCY STEWART, ) ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) vs. ) ) BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) Case No.: 10-01225SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING DATE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 23 WHEREAS, the parties are currently scheduled to conduct a Settlement Conference with 24 the Hon. Joseph C. Spero on December 5, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.; 25 WHEREAS, the parties, by mutual agreement, wish to continue the Settlement 26 Conference to February 15, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. to facilitate completion of discovery necessary to 27 prepare for the Settlement Conference; 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING DATE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 1 1 2 WHEREAS, plaintiff’s counsel William E. Kennedy has confirmed with the Hon. Joseph 3 C. Spero’s staff that Judge Spero is available February 15, 2012 for a Settlement Conference and 4 has reserved that date, and all parties have affirmed their availability to attend the Settlement 5 Conference on that date; 6 7 SO STIPULATED 8 Dated: October 27, 2011 LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM E. KENNEDY HUMPHREYS WALLACE HUMPHREYS P.C. 9 10 By: 11 12 /s/ William E. Kennedy Attorneys for Plaintiffs WILLIAM G. STEWART and NANCY STEWART 13 Dated: October 27, 2011 REED SMITH LLP 14 15 By: 16 /s/ David S. Reidy Attorneys for Defendant BAC Home Loans LP 17 18 Dated: October 26, 2011 KING & SPALDING LLP By: _/s/___________________________ Ann K. Broussard Attorneys for Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC Dated: October 26, 2011 JONES DAY By: _/s/___________________________ Jason C. Wright Attorneys for Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS Dated: October 26, 2011 SCHUCKIT & ASSOCIATES 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 BY: _/s/___________________________ Karen Butler Reisinger ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT TRANS UNION LLC 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING DATE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 2 1 2 3 4 5 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 William E. Kennedy, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 27, 2011 at Santa Clara, California. 6 7 Dated: October 27, 2011 LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM E. KENNEDY 8 By: 9 10 /s/ William E. Kennedy Attorneys for Plaintiffs WILLIAM G. STEWART and NANCY STEWART 11 12 ORDER 13 14 The Settlement Conference currently scheduled for December 5, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. is 15 rescheduled to February 15, 2012 at 9:30. The due dates for the Settlement Conference 16 Statement shall be calculated from February 15, 2012. 17 SO ORDERED S R NIA FO LI ER H 23 _______________________________________ Hon. Joseph C. Spero . Spero ph Court United StatesJuDistrict C dge Jose RT 22 Date: ________________ 11/2/11 NO 21 A 20 RT U O 19 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T UNIT ED 18 N F D IS T IC T O R C 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING DATE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?