In Re Pimentel

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING BANKRUPTCY APPEAL. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 24, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California IN RE DEBORAH PIMENTEL, Appellant. / No. C 10-01237 WHA ORDER DISMISSING BANKRUPTCY APPEAL 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Appellant Deborah Pimentel -- who is representing herself in this matter but is also a licensed and practicing California attorney -- has been twice ordered to show cause why this bankruptcy appeal should not be dismissed for failure to perfect the record under Bankruptcy Rule 8006 (Dkt. Nos. 5, 9). The first order to show cause was filed on May 20, 2010, after Attorney Pimentel failed to perfect the record for almost two months after the instant appeal was noticed. After considering Attorney Pimentel's response, the undersigned granted appellant an additional three weeks to perfect the record (Dkt. No. 7). Attorney Pimentel was expressly warned, however, that "if the record on appeal was not perfected by [this deadline], the matter would be dismissed." She failed to perfect the record by the deadline. A second order to show cause then issued, warning Attorney Pimentel that failure to respond and explain her inaction by noon on June 23 would result in the immediate dismissal of her appeal (Dkt. No. 9). She filed no response to the order. In light of this procedural history, the instant appeal is hereby DISMISSED. The undersigned provided Attorney Pimentel with a full and fair opportunity to prosecute her appeal, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 and even granted a lengthy extension of already past-due deadlines to allow her additional time to perfect the record. Despite express warnings that the appeal would be dismissed if the extended deadlines were not met, Attorney Pimentel failed to demonstrate diligence in prosecuting her appeal. As such, dismissal is proper. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 24, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?