Goodman Ball, Inc. et al v. Mach II Aviation, Inc. et al

Filing 45

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 8, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2010)

Goodman Ball, Inc. et al v. Mach II Aviation, Inc. et al

Doc. 45

Case3:10-cv-01249-WHA Document44

Filed10/08/10 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MACH II AVIATION, INC.; ) ESCAPE VELOCITY OF TAMPA BAY, ) ) INC.; JOHN STANTON; WALTER ) HOLMICH; PETER ARGER; and Does 1- ) ) 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) )

GOODMAN BALL, INC.

Case No.: 3:10-CV-01249-WHA PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION

DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 2011 TIME: 1:30 PM CTRM: 9, 19th Fl. Judge: The Honorable William H. Alsup

Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:10-cv-01249-WHA Document44

Filed10/08/10 Page2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to this Court's Case Management Order and Reference to ADR Unit for Mediation issued on September 22, 2010 (Docket No. 37), Plaintiff Goodman Ball, Inc. ("GBI") files and emails this joint Proposed Order Re Schedule for Claim Construction to [e-mail].

2
PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION-3:10-CV-01249-WHA

Case3:10-cv-01249-WHA Document44

Filed10/08/10 Page3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PROPOSED ORDER RE ESCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION

Event Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions and Accompanying Documents ­ Patent L.R. 3-1 and 3-2 Disclosure of Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and Accompanying Documents­ Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 Exchange of Proposed Terms and Claim Elements for Construction ­ Patent L.R. 4-1(a) Disclosure of Identity, Qualifications, and Expertise of Expert Witnesses Exchange of Preliminary Claim Construction and Extrinsic Evidence ­ Patent L.R. 4-2(a) Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Patent L.R. 4-3 Claim Construction Prehearing Conference Expert Witness Reports on Markman Issues Completion of Claim Construction Discovery Patent L.R.4-4 Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief Patent L.R. 4-5 Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Response Claim Construction Hearing

Date 09/27/10

10/13/10 1

10/20/10 10/20/10 11/10/10 11/20/10 11/27/10 12/27/10 12/27/10 01/04/11 01/18/11 01/25/11 02/09/11

By providing this Proposed Order Re Schedule for Claim Construction, GBI does not in any way whatsoever consent to allow Defendants to challenge the validity of the `260 patent. In a series of emails and teleconferences, GBI has stated its position that it would object to any challenge by Defendants to the `260 patent in light of the Prior Litigation.

1

3
PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION-3:10-CV-01249-WHA

Case3:10-cv-01249-WHA Document44

Filed10/08/10 Page4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SHUTTS & BOWEN LLP

AHMADSHAHI & ASSOCIATES

Respectfully Submitted, /S/John E. Johnson John E. Johnson Attorney for Defendants Seeking Pro Hac Vice Admission Pursuant to Gen. Ord. 45XB Michael M. Ahmadshahi attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above signatory.

Respectfully Submitted, /S/ Michael M. Ahmadshahi Michael M. Ahmadshahi Attorney for Plaintiff

The proposed claim construction schedule is APPROVED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4
PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION-3:10-CV-01249-WHA

Case3:10-cv-01249-WHA Document44

Filed10/08/10 Page5 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Michael M. Ahmadshahi, certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Proposed Order Re Schedule for Claim Construction was served on the interested parties listed below, via the Court's Electronic Filing Program, United States Mail, Electronic Mail, and/or any other manner permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on October 8, 2010. /S/ Michael M. Ahmadshahi Michael M. Ahmadshahi, Esq. AHMADSHAHI & ASSOCIATES Michael M. Ahmadshahi, Esq. (Bar No. 219933) Shana L. Villoria, Esq. (Bar No.261342) 600 Anton Blvd., Ste. 1100 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 714.371.4221 Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Attorney for Plaintiff, GOODMAN BALL, INC. Arthur H. Barens Joe Hariton Law Offices of Arthur H. Barnes 10209 Santa Monica Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] John E. Johnson Janelle A. Weber Shutts & Bowen LLP 100 S. Ashley Drive, Ste. 1500 Tampa, FL 33602 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants Mach II and Escape Velocity in Case No. 3:07-CV-01148-BZ; and Attorneys for Defendants Escape Velocity, Stanton, and Arger in Case No. 3:10-CV-01249WHA.

5
PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION-3:10-CV-01249-WHA