Haynie et al v. City of Pleasanton et al

Filing 56

ORDER to continue 5/25/12 conference. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/29/2012 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/19/12., Motions terminated: (9 in 3:12-cv-00452-SI) STIPULATION WI TH PROPOSED ORDER re: Case Management filed by The Calguns Foundation, Inc., Max Joseph Plog-Horowitz, The Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., (21 in 3:11-cv-05580-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re: Case Management filed by The Calguns Foundation, Inc., The Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., Brendan John Richards, (55 in 3:10-cv-01255-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re: Case Management filed by Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., Mark Aaron Haynie, Calguns Foundation, Inc.. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Donald E.J. Kilmer, Jr. (SBN: 179986) E-Mail: Don@DKLawOffice.com Jason A. Davis (SBN: 224250) E-Mail: Jason@CalGunLawyers.com 1645 Willow Street, Suite 150 San Jose, California 95125-5120 Voice: (408) 264-8489 Fax: (408) 264-8487 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 MARK AARON HAYNIE, BRENDAN JOHN RICHARDS, THE CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., and THE SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiffs, vs. KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of California (in her official capacity) and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, OFFICER DEAN BECKER (RP134), and DOES 1 TO 20, Defendants. Case Nos.: 3:10-CV-01255 SI 3:11-CV-02493 SI (Consolidated Cases) STIPULATION and JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION and PROPOSED ORDER Re: Case Management 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 BRENDAN JOHN RICHARDS, THE CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., and THE SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiffs, vs. KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of California (in her official capacity) and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFFS’ OFFICE, SHERIFFS’ DEPUTY GREG MYERS (SD1023) and DOES 1 TO 20, Defendants. Case No.: 3:11-CV-05580 SI (Related Case) STIPULATION and JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION and PROPOSED ORDER Re: Case Management 28 Stipulation/Order: Case Management Page 1 of 3 Haynie v. Harris 1 4 MAX JOSEPH PLOG-HOROWITZ, THE CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., and THE SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiffs, 5 vs. 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of California, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, COTATI POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF COTATI, ANDREW LYSSAND (CO0339) and DOES 1 TO 20, Defendants. Case No.: 3:12-CV-0452 LB (Related Case) STIPULATION and JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION and PROPOSED ORDER Re: Case Management IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED1 by and between the parties hereto through 13 their respective attorneys of record that the pending Case Management Conference 14 currently set for May 25, 2012 in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor of the U.S. District Court 15 for the Northern District of California should be reset. 16 The Defendants in Richards v. Harris I (Rohnert Park), Case No.: 3:11-CV- 17 02493 SI have a motion to dismiss under submission that has been fully briefed and 18 was argued on May 4, 2012. 19 Furthermore, it would appears that a settlement has been reached between 20 the plaintiffs and the Sonoma County Defendants in Richards v. Harris II (Sonoma 21 County), Case No.: 3:11-CV-05580 SI. The parties are in the process of executing 22 the necessary documents for settlement, release and dismissal of those Defendants 23 in that case. 24 1 25 26 27 28 Haynie v. Harris, Case No.: 3:10-CV-01255 SI was ordered consolidated with Richards v. Harris, Case No.: 3:11-CV-02493 SI, in an ordered filed on October 22, 2011. (See Documents # 42 and #15 respectively. The second Richards v. Harris, Case No.: 3:11-CV-05580 was ordered to be related with the first two cases in an order filed on December 21, 2011. (See documents #47 and # 20 respectively.) The Ploghorowitz v. Harris, Case No.: 3:12-CV-0452 SI was ordered to be related on April 11, 2012. (See documents #32 and #20) Stipulation/Order: Case Management Page 2 of 3 Haynie v. Harris 1 The remaining parties propose that the Court reset the Case Management 2 Conference to some date after the Court anticipates releasing its order from the 3 May 4, 2012 hearing. 4 SO STIPULATED. 5 Date: May 16, 2012 Date: May 16, 2012 6 /s/ Ross Moody, Counsel for Defendants Harris & California Dept. of Justice /s/ Donald Kilmer Counsel for Plaintiffs Date: May 16, 2012 Date: May 16, 2012 /s/ Robert W. Henkels Counsel for Defendants City of Rohnert Park & Becker Counsel for Defendants Cotati Police Department, City of Cotati, & Lyssand /s/ Anne Keck Counsel for Defendants Sonoma County & Myer 7 8 9 10 1645 Willow St., Suite 150, San Jose, CA 95125 Vc: (408) 264-8489 Fx: (408) 264-8487 Don@DKLawOffice.com LAW OFFICE OF DONALD KILMER, APC 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ATTESTATION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND LOCAL RULE VIII.B. I, Donald Kilmer, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of California and the United States that I have in my possession e-mail correspondence from Ross Moody, Robert Henkels and Anne Keck that the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document. I declare that this document was signed in San Jose, CA on May 16, 2012. 18 19 /s/ Donald Kilmer Attorney for Plaintiffs 20 ORDER 21 22 23 The Case Management Conference in these consolidated and related matters 6/29/12 currently set for May 25, 2012 is reset to: (Date) _____________________________, at 3:00 (Time): _____________, in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor of the U.S. District Court for the 24 Northern District of California – San Francisco. A Joint Case Management 25 Conference Statement shall be filed seven (7) calendar days before the new date. 26 Date: 27 5.19.12 United States District Judge 28 Stipulation/Order: Case Management Page 3 of 3 Haynie v. Harris

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?