Haynie et al v. City of Pleasanton et al
Filing
60
ORDER Further Case Management Conference set for 7/27/12 is continued to 8/24/2012 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco., Motions terminated: (36 in 3:11-cv-02493-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re: Case Management file d by The Calguns Foundation, Inc., The Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., Brendan John Richards, (59 in 3:10-cv-01255-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re: Case Management filed by California Department of Justice, Kamala Harris.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 7/24/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
PETER A. KRAUSE
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
ROSS C. MOODY
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 142541
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 703-1376
Fax: (415) 703-1234
E-mail: Ross.Moody@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants California Department of
Justice and Attorney General Kamala D. Harris
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARK AARON HAYNIE, BRENDAN
JOHN RICHARDS, THE CALGUNS
FOUNDATION, INC., and THE SECOND
AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.,
10-cv-1255-SI
11-cv-2493 SI
(Consolidated Cases)
STIPULATION and JOINT
Plaintiffs, ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION and
v.
PROPOSED ORDER
Re: Case Management
KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of
California (in her official capacity) and
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, CITY OF ROHNERT PARK,
OFFICER DEAN BECKER (RP134), and
DOES 1 TO 20,
Defendants.
BRENDAN JOHN RICHARDS, THE
CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., and THE 11-cv-5580 SI
SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, (Related Case)
INC. ,
STIPULATION and JOINT
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION and
Plaintiffs, PROPOSED ORDER
v.
Re: Case Management
KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of
California (in her official capacity),
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, SONOMA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY GREG MYERS (SD1023) and
DOES 1 TO 20
Defendants.
28
1
Stipulation/Order: Case Management (10-cv-1255-SI)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MAX JOSEPH PLOG-HOROWITZ, THE
CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., and THE 12-cv-00452 (LB)
SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, (Related Case)
INC.,
Plaintiffs, STIPULATION and JOINT
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION and
v.
PROPOSED ORDER
Re: Case Management
KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of
California, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE, COTATI POLICE
DEPARTMENT, CITY OF COTATI,
ANDREW LYSSAND (CO0339) and DOES
1 TO 20,
Defendants.
9
10
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED1 by and between the parties hereto through their respective
11
attorneys of record that the pending Case Management Conference currently set for July 27, 2012
12
in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
13
should be reset.
The Defendants in Richards v. Harris I (Rohnert Park), Case No.: 3:11-CV-02493 SI have
14
15
a motion to dismiss under submission that has been fully briefed and was argued on May 4, 2012.
16
The parties believe that it would be a more productive use of the Court’s time and resources to
17
have the Case Management Conference after a ruling on the motion to dismiss has been issued
Accordingly, the parties propose that the Court reset the Case Management Conference to
18
19
some date after the Court anticipates releasing its order from the May 4, 2012 hearing.
20
For the convenience of the Court and its staff, Plaintiffs’ counsel advises that he is
21
unavailable on the following Fridays: August 10 and 17, September 27, and October 5, 2012.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
26
27
28
1
Haynie v. Harris, Case No.: 3:10-CV-01255 SI was ordered consolidated with Richards
v. Harris, Case No.: 3:11-CV-02493 SI, in an order filed on October 22, 2011. (See Documents #
42 and #15 respectively.) The second Richards v. Harris, Case No.: 3:11-CV-05580 was ordered
to be related with the first two cases in an order filed on December 21, 2011. (See documents #47
and # 20 respectively.) The Ploghorowitz v. Harris, Case No.: 3:12-CV-0452 SI was ordered to
be related on April 11, 2012. (See documents #32 and #20.)
2
Stipulation/Order: Case Management (10-cv-1255-SI)
1
SO STIPULATED.
2
Dated: July 19, 2012
Dated: July 19, 2012
/s/ Ross Moody
________________________________
Ross Moody
Counsel for Defendants
Harris & California Dept. of Justice
/s/ Donald Kilmer
________________________________
Donald Kilmer
Counsel for Plaintiffs
3
4
5
6
7
Dated: July 19, 2012
8
/s/ Robert W. Henkels
________________________________
Robert W. Henkels
Counsel for Defendants
City of Rohnert Park & Becker
Counsel for Defendants
Cotati Police Department,
City of Cotati, & Lyssand
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
ATTESTATION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND LOCAL
RULE VIII.B.
I, Ross C. Moody, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of California and the
17
United States that I have in my possession e-mail correspondence from Donald Kilmer and
18
Robert Henkels that the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the
19
document. I declare that this document was signed in San Francisco, CA on July 19, 2012.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
/s/ Ross Moody
________________________________
Ross Moody
Deputy Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants
California Department of Justice and
Attorney General Kamala D. Harris
ORDER
27
The Case Management Conference in these consolidated and related matters currently set
August 24, 2012
3:00 p.m.
for July 27, 2012 is reset to: (Date) _________________________, at (Time): _____________,
28
in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California –
3
Stipulation/Order: Case Management (10-cv-1255-SI)
1
San Francisco. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be filed seven (7) calendar
2
days before the new date.
3
Date: 7/24/12
4
__________________________________
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
SA2010101060
20620461.doc
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Stipulation/Order: Case Management (10-cv-1255-SI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?