Haynie et al v. City of Pleasanton et al

Filing 73

ORDER Further Case Management Conference set for 2/8/13 is continued to 4/5/2013 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 2/4/13., Motions terminated: 72 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to reset CMC filed by Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., Mark Aaron Haynie, Calguns Foundation, Inc., Brendan John Richards. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2013)

1 Donald E. J. Kilmer, Jr. [SBN: 179986]
LAW OFFICES OF DONALD KILMER
2 1645 Willow Street, Suite 150
San Jose, California 95125
3 Voice: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
4 E-Mail: [e-mail]
5 Jason A. Davis [SBN: 224250]
Davis & Associates
6 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
7 Voice: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
8 E-Mail: [e-mail]
9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARK AARON HAYNIE, BRENDAN
JOHN RICHARDS, THE CALGUNS
FOUNDATION, INC., and THE
SECOND AMENDMENT
FOUNDATION, INC.,

Case No.:

3:10-CV-01255 SI

STIPULATION and JOINT
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION and
PROPOSED ORDER
Re: Case Management

Plaintiffs,

17

vs.

18

KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General
of California, CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CITY
OF ROHNERT PARK, and OFFICER
DEAN BECKER (RP134)

19
20
21

Defendants.

22
23

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through

24 their respective attorneys of record that the pending Case Management Conference
25 currently set for February 8, 2013 in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor of the U.S. District
26 Court for the Northern District of California should be reset.
27
Donald Kilmer
Attorney at Law
1645 Willow St.
Suite 150
San Jose, CA 95125
Vc: 408/264-8489
Fx: 408/264-8487

The Rohnert Park Defendants and the Plaintiffs are engaged in earnest self-

28 directed settlement discussions.
CMC Stipulation & Order

Page 1 of 3

Haynie, et al. v. Harris, et al.

1

If a settlement can be reached, then the remaining parties (California

2 Department of Justice and the Plaintiffs) will proceed with setting hearing dates for
3 dispositive motions at the next Case Management Conference.
4

The parties propose that the Court reset the Case Management Conference to

5 a convenient Friday in April 2013 in order to give the parties engaged in settlement
6 discussions the time necessary to conclude that process or to request formal ADR
7 assistance from the Court.
8 SO STIPULATED.
9 Date: February 1, 2013

Date: February 1, 2013

10

/s/
Ross Moody,
11 Counsel for Defendants
Harris & California Dept. of Justice
12

/s/
Donald Kilmer
Counsel for Plaintiffs

13 Date: February 1, 2013
14

/s/
Robert W. Henkels
15 Counsel for Defendants
City of Rohnert Park & Becker
16
17
18

ATTESTATION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND

19

LOCAL RULE VIII.B.

20

I, Donald Kilmer, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of California

21 and the United States that I have in my possession e-mail correspondence from
22 Ross Moody, and Robert Henkels that the content of this document is acceptable to
23 all persons required to sign the document. I declare that this document was signed
24 in San Jose, CA on February 1, 2013.
25
/s/
26 Donald Kilmer
Attorney for Plaintiffs
27
Donald Kilmer
Attorney at Law
1645 Willow St.
Suite 150
San Jose, CA 95125
Vc: 408/264-8489
Fx: 408/264-8487

28
CMC Stipulation & Order

Page 2 of 3

Haynie, et al. v. Harris, et al.

1
2

ORDER

3

The Case Management Conference currently set for February 8, 2013 is reset
April 5, 2013
3 p.m.
4 to: (Date) _____________________________, at (Time): _____________, in Courtroom
5 10, 19th Floor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California – San
6 Francisco. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be filed seven (7)
7 calendar days before the new date.
8 Date: 2/5/13
9
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Donald Kilmer
Attorney at Law
1645 Willow St.
Suite 150
San Jose, CA 95125
Vc: 408/264-8489
Fx: 408/264-8487

28
CMC Stipulation & Order

Page 3 of 3

Haynie, et al. v. Harris, et al.