Kronzer v. Hintz
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 10/21/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TH O M A S EASTON CSB #109218 LA W OFFICE OF THOMAS EASTON 967 Sunset Dr Springfield, OR 97477 Tel: 541-746-1335 email@example.com Attorneys for Plaintiff
U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT N O R T H E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA T IM KRONZER, P l a i n t i f f, N O . CV-10-1270 BZ R E Q U E S T TO VACATE CASE M A N A G E M E N T CONFERENCE a n d (PROPOSED) ORDER D a te : O c to b e r 25, 2020 T im e : 1 0 :0 0 a.m. C trm : G , 15 th Floor J u d g e : Hon. Bernard Zimmerman
9 10 11
v. G A R Y HINTZ, and DOES 1-10, D e f e n d a n t s.
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D a te d :_ _10/_ _ _201_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 21/ _ _ 0 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the forgoing document has been filed w ith the Courts' CM/ECF filing system on this 20 th day of October, 2010, which will provide s e rv ic e on all counsel of record. ISTRIC s/T h o m a s Easton, Esq; ES D T IT IS SO ORDERED. D e f en d a n t Gary Hintz having defaulted and the clerk having entered the default on O c to b e r 15, 2010 (Doc.12), and plaintiff Tim Kronzer having filed a Motion for Default J u d g m e n t on October 17, 2010 (Doc. 13) and on October 20, 2010 filed a Re-Notice of M o tio n for Default Judgment setting the hearing on same for November 3, 2010 (Doc.14), p la in tif f Kronzer hereby requests the Court vacate the Case Management Conference set for M o n d a y, October 25, 2010. D a te d : October 20, 2010. R e s p e c tf u lly submitted, s/ Thomas Easton, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Tim Kronzer
RT U O
ernard Z Judge B
_________________________________ H O N . BERNARD ZIMMERMAN
F D IS T IC T O R
REQUEST TO VACATE CM C & CER.T O F SVC, & (PROPOSED) ORDER ~ CV-10-1270 BZ
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?