United States of America et al v. Ivaldi
Filing
30
ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 29 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/11/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
THOMAS MOORE (ALBN 4305-O78T)
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Tax Division
CYNTHIA STIER (DCBN 423256)
Assistant United States Attorney
11th Floor Federal Building
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: (415) 436-7000
Attorneys for the United States of America
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
CHUNG NGO, Revenue Agent,
13
Petitioners,
14
15
16
17
v.
RICHARD IVALDI,
Respondent.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. CV 10-1277 EMC
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
)
)
)
)
19
Petitioners, United States of America and Chung Ngo, Revenue Agent, hereby
20
advise the Court that respondent, Richard Ivaldi, has provided the IRS with sufficient
21
records such that it no longer seeks enforcement of the subpoena. Accordingly, the
22
United States of America asks that this matter be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of
23
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
24
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
25
26
27
28
/s/ Cynthia Stier
CYNTHIA STIER
Assistant United States Attorney
Tax Division
1
ORDER
2
Upon the request of the petitioners and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal
3
Rules of Civil Procedure, this action is hereby dismissed.
Francisco, California.
RT
11
ER
H
12
dward
Judge E
NO
.
EDWARD M. CHEN
ERED
O ORD
S SUnited States District Judge
IT I
13
N
n
M. Che
F
D IS T IC T O
R
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Notice of Dismissal and [Proposed] Order,
US v. Richard Ivaldi, (No. 10-1277)
R NIA
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
UNIT
ED
8
, 2012, at San
RT
U
O
7
10
January
day of
S
6
11th
LI
ORDERED this
5
A
4
2
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?