United States of America et al v. Ivaldi

Filing 30

ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 29 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/11/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney THOMAS MOORE (ALBN 4305-O78T) Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division CYNTHIA STIER (DCBN 423256) Assistant United States Attorney 11th Floor Federal Building 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7000 Attorneys for the United States of America 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CHUNG NGO, Revenue Agent, 13 Petitioners, 14 15 16 17 v. RICHARD IVALDI, Respondent. 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. CV 10-1277 EMC NOTICE OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) ) ) 19 Petitioners, United States of America and Chung Ngo, Revenue Agent, hereby 20 advise the Court that respondent, Richard Ivaldi, has provided the IRS with sufficient 21 records such that it no longer seeks enforcement of the subpoena. Accordingly, the 22 United States of America asks that this matter be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of 23 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 24 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 25 26 27 28 /s/ Cynthia Stier CYNTHIA STIER Assistant United States Attorney Tax Division 1 ORDER 2 Upon the request of the petitioners and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal 3 Rules of Civil Procedure, this action is hereby dismissed. Francisco, California. RT 11 ER H 12 dward Judge E NO . EDWARD M. CHEN ERED O ORD S SUnited States District Judge IT I 13 N n M. Che F D IS T IC T O R 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of Dismissal and [Proposed] Order, US v. Richard Ivaldi, (No. 10-1277) R NIA 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO UNIT ED 8 , 2012, at San RT U O 7 10 January day of S 6 11th LI ORDERED this 5 A 4 2 C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?