IO Group, Inc. et al v. GLBT, Ltd. et al
Filing
103
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 30, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
IO GROUP, INC., et al.,
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
v.
13
14
No. C-10-1282 MMC
GLBT, LTD., et al.,
Defendants.
15
/
16
Before the Court is the “Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Order for Seizure,
17
18
and Appointment of Receiver,” which motion the Court has construed as a motion for a
19
preliminary injunction, filed August 11, 2011 by Plaintiffs IO Group, Inc., Channel One
20
Releasing, Inc., and Liberty Media Holdings, LLC (“Plaintiffs”). Defendants GLBT, Ltd.,
21
Mash and New, Ltd., Port 80, Ltd., Steven John Compton, and David Graham Compton
22
(“Defendants”) have filed opposition, to which Plaintiffs have replied. The matter came on
23
regularly for hearing August 29, 2011. Marc John Randazza of Liberty Media Holdings,
24
LLC, and D. Gill Sperlein appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. Jonathan Capp appeared on
25
behalf of Defendants. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in
26
opposition to the motion, and having considered the arguments of counsel, the Court rules
27
as follows.
28
//
Plaintiffs request that the Court use its equitable powers to issue an order to stop
1
2
Defendants from dissipating assets. For the reasons stated at the hearing conducted
3
August 29, 2011, the Court finds Plaintiffs have demonstrated they have a likelihood of
4
success on the merits of their claims, they are likely to suffer irreparable harm in the
5
absence of the requested injunctive relief, the balance of equities tips sharply in their favor,
6
and the injunction is in the public interest.
7
Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion is hereby GRANTED in part as follows:
8
1. The request to appoint a receiver is GRANTED. Ann Bradley, whose business
9
address is Foley & Lardner LLP, 555 South Flower Street, Suite 3500, Los Angeles, CA
10
90071-2411 is APPOINTED as the Receiver. The Receiver shall perform the following:
a. The Receiver shall promptly file her oath of Receiver with the Court,
11
12
whereby she shall undertake fully and faithfully to perform her duties as Receiver;
b. The Receiver is authorized to collect and take immediate possession and
13
14
control of the following domain name registrations:
15
Registered through Key-Systems GmbH
16
1. Gayforit.com
17
2. Jerkyourtube.com
18
3. Gayforit.eu
19
4. Jerkyourtube.eu
20
5. Itsallgay.eu
21
Registered through Homestead Ltd., d/b/a namevault.com
22
1. Itsallgay.com
23
and shall deliver a copy of this Order to Key-Systems GmbH and Homestead Ltd. and shall
24
take all necessary steps to assist Key-Systems GmbH and Homestead Ltd. in the transfer
25
of the domain name registrations into an account controlled by the Receiver. Such
26
registrations must include the title to the domain name registrations and not simply control
27
of the WHOIS information;
28
//
2
c. The Receiver shall act in accordance with and shall have all of the usual,
1
2
necessary, and incidental powers of a receiver to maintain and preserve Defendants’
3
domain name portfolio;
d. Except as otherwise provided in this Order, the Receiver shall hold the
4
5
domains in their current configuration unless the Court issues a further order to the
6
Receiver;
7
e. Discharge of the Receivership shall require a Court Order after a properly
8
noticed motion approving the Receiver’s Final Report and Accounting is filed with the Court
9
and served on the Parties;
10
f. The Receiver is directed to obtain a bond in the amount of $1,000.00
11
securing performance by the Receiver of the duties and obligations of her office of
12
receivership. The bond shall provide coverage to Plaintiffs and Defendants for loss due to
13
acts of any agent, servant, or employee of the Receiver. However, the Receiver shall not
14
be personally liable for losses, provided that the Receiver has acted in good faith to
15
perform her duties and has not committed gross negligence or other gross misconduct.
16
The bond shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Court within 10 days of the date of this
17
Order. Given the limited nature of this injunction, no further bond is required.
18
2. Defendants are ORDERED to comply with the following directives:
19
a. Defendants shall instruct Key-Systems GmbH and Homestead Ltd. to
20
transfer the six domain name registrations identified in ¶ 1.b above to an account controlled
21
by the Receiver and take all necessary action to facilitate these transfers. Such
22
registrations must include the title to the domain name registrations and not simply control
23
of the WHOIS information.
24
b. Defendants shall take any and all steps necessary to effectuate the
25
Receiver’s compliance with this Order, including gathering domain name transfer codes for
26
all six relevant domain names and communicating the codes to the Receiver.
27
28
c. During the pendency of this action, if Defendants desire to change the
records or nameservers that control where any such domain name points, they may file an
3
1
administrative motion requesting an order from the Court instructing the Receiver to make
2
the desired change.
3
3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are enjoined from:
a. directing traffic away from any of the domains turned over to the control of
4
5
6
the Receiver;
b. reorganizing the current websites to operate at any domain names other
7
than those turned over to the control of the Receiver, including, but not limited to,
8
registering or using domain names (in any TLD) corresponding to the terms “gayforit”
9
“jerkyourtube” or “itsallgay”;
10
11
12
13
14
15
c. taking any other action designed to transfer the value of the domain
names controlled by the Receiver to alternative domain names;
d. taking any action to cause damage or harm to the assets transferred to the
Receiver; and
e. taking any action in furtherance of dissipation of assets.
4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall advance to the Receiver fees
16
and costs associated with administration of the receivership estate, such fees and costs to
17
be recoverable pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505 and/or Civil Local Rule 54-3(f) if Plaintiffs
18
subsequently establish their entitlement thereto.
19
5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all persons receiving notice of this Order,
20
including without limitation all domain name registrars and all domain name registry
21
operators, shall comply promptly with the Receiver's directives as provided for in this Order,
22
including without limitation any directives by the Receiver to transfer any and all domain
23
names between registrants, or between registrars, or the reassignment of the registrant or
24
registrar of any domain names. In the event that Defendants do not cooperate with the
25
portions of this Order compelling them to transfer the six domain names to the Receiver,
26
Verisign (operator of the .com registry) and EurID (operator of the .eu registry) shall
27
transfer the three domain names in each of their registries to the Receiver, with or without
28
the consent or cooperation of Defendants.
4
1
6. This ORDER shall take effect immediately upon entry.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: August 30, 2011
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?