IO Group, Inc. et al v. GLBT, Ltd. et al
Filing
53
ORDER To Submit Additional Information re 52 Discovery Disputes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 05/26/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
IO GROUP INC,
12
13
Plaintiffs,
v.
14
ORDER TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION REGARDING
DISCOVERY DISPUTES
GLBT LTD,
15
No. C-10-01282 MMC (DMR)
Defendants.
___________________________________/
16
17
The Court is in receipt of the parties’ second joint letter regarding their discovery disputes,
18
which addresses three separate unresolved issues. See Docket No. 52. The Court orders the parties
19
to submit additional information regarding their disputes as set forth below.
20
By no later than June 3, 2011, Defendants shall file an updated letter from Defendant David
21
Compton’s treating physician that sets forth in sufficient detail any current limitations on Mr.
22
Compton’s ability to travel and/or participate in a deposition, as well as the nature, extent, and
23
duration of any such limitations. No further briefing or argument on the issue of the location of the
24
depositions shall be submitted.
25
The parties are ordered to further meet and confer and to provide additional briefing in the
26
form of one joint letter that is no longer than 10 pages by no later than June 3, 2011, addressing
27
unresolved issues 3 and 4, as follows:
28
1
Unresolved issue 3: to the extent that Request for Production Nos. 7, 9, and 11 seek
2
documents that identify and contain confidential information about third parties, Plaintiffs shall
3
address the relevance of the requested documents/information and provide support for their position
4
that they are entitled to the production of such documents/information. Defendants shall specify
5
which provisions of British privacy laws, including the Data Protection Act, they contend apply to
6
the specific information sought by the requests and shall provide legal support for their application
7
to this litigation. Plaintiffs shall provide a response to Defendants’ position that the information is
8
protected from disclosure by the privacy law(s) specified by Defendants as described above.
9
Unresolved issue 4: the parties have not submitted adequate information to enable the Court
to evaluate the issue. Therefore, in accordance with this Court’s Order Regarding Resolution of
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Discovery Disputes (Docket No. 49), the parties shall meet and confer regarding each of the
12
remaining Requests for Production that are in dispute and describe any remaining issues in the joint
13
letter, including providing each party’s final proposed compromise with respect to the remaining
14
issues.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 26, 2011
17
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?