Riley v. City and County fo San Francisco

Filing 22

ORDER granting one day extension (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2010)

Download PDF
Riley v. City and County fo San Francisco Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137 VINCE CHHABRIA, State Bar #208557 Deputy City Attorneys City Hall, Room 234 #1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, California 94102-4682 Telephone: (415) 554-4674 Facsimile: (415) 554-4699 E-Mail: vince.chhabria@sfgov.org Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DEBORAH CAROL ENGLAND, State Bar #122424 Law Offices of Deborah C. England 351 California St Ste 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 434-9800 Facsimile: (415) 434-9230 E-Mail: dcengland@earthlink.net Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN J. RILEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN J. RILEY, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiff, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DOES 1-20, inclusive, Trial Date: Defendant. None Set Case No. CV-10-1300 SI STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR ONE-DAY EXTENSION TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS; [PROPOSED] ORDER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; Case No. C10-1300 SI 1 n:\lit\li2010\100952\00652294.doc Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 16, 2010 STIPULATED APPLICATION The parties' cross-motions for partial summary judgment are set for hearing on October 1, 2010. Currently, plaintiff's reply/opposition brief is due September 20, 2010, and defendant's reply brief is due September 24, 2010. Counsel for the defendant now has a previously-unanticipated conflict that will interfere with the City's ability to file its reply on September 24, 2010. Accordingly, the parties file this stipulated application to extend the due date for each side's brief by one day, so that plaintiff's reply/opposition is due September 21, 2010, and defendant's reply is due September 27, 2010. IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: September 16, 2010 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS VINCE CHHABRIA Deputy City Attorneys By: s/Vince Chhabria VINCE CHHABRIA Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO By: **s/Deborah England Deborah C. England Attorney for Plaintiff JOHN J. RILEY **Pursuant to GO 45, the electronic signatory has obtained approval from this signatory. ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the plaintiff's reply/opposition is due no later than September 21, 2010, and the defendant's reply is due no later than September 27, 2010. Date: THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Court STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; Case No. C10-1300 SI 2 n:\lit\li2010\100952\00652294.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?