Hofstetter v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al

Filing 9

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 16, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHEILA I HOFSTETTER, individually, as a representative of the class, and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiff, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, CHASE BANK USA, NA, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. / No. C 10-01313 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME

The undersigned will not "rubber stamp" the stipulation to extend time to answer and to permit a 49-day briefing schedule for responsive motions. The parties, however, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, can stipulate -- without a court order -- to an enlargement of time "within which to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, or to enlarge . . . time in matters not required to be filed or lodged with the Court, provided the change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by court order."

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 16, 2010.

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE