National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al v. Resource Development Services, Inc. et al

Filing 517

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/11/2015. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/26/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, Plaintiff, United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 Case No. 10-cv-01324-RS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. 15 16 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) plaintiff’s motion for sanctions and/or contempt 17 against Valley Recycling is suitable for disposition without oral argument and the hearing set for 18 September 3, 2015 is hereby vacated. A final ruling on the motion will be deferred pending any 19 response to this order to show cause. No later than September 11, 2015, Valley Recycling shall 20 file a declaration or declarations and, optionally, a brief not to exceed 8 pages, setting out cause, if 21 any it has, why the relief requested by plaintiff should not issue. 22 There is some indication counsel for Valley Recycling may have failed to keep the ECF 23 system records updated with current email addresses. Accordingly, as a courtesy, a copy of this 24 order will be mailed to: 25 26 27 28 Lawrence Pedro Ramirez The Litigation Law Group 111 North Market Street Suite 1010 San Jose, CA 95113 1 In the event ECF records are not current, counsel is directed to provide updates forthwith. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 Dated: August 26, 2015 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 2 10-cv-01324-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?