Teleconference Systems LLC v. Tandberg, Inc et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 16 Stipulation filed by Tandberg, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/3/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795) matthew.powes@weil.com EDWARD R. REINES (Bar No. 135960) edward.reines@weil.com SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086) sonal.mehta@weil.com RIP FINST (Bar No. 234478) rip.finst@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 Attorneys for Defendant TANDBERG, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. TANDBERG, INC., AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., BAYER CORPORATION, ERICSSON, INC., AND ONE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendants. Case No. C 10-01325 EMC STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC'S COMPLAINT ; ORDER Hon. Edward M. Chen STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT Case No. C 10-01325 EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff Teleconference Systems, LLC ("TS") hereby agrees pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a) to enlarge the time within which Defendants Tandberg, Inc., Avago Technologies U.S., Inc., Bayer Corporation, and One Communications Corporation may answer, move or otherwise respond to TS's Complaint to and including June 14, 2010. This is the first enlargement of time for the above-named Defendants to answer, move or otherwise respond to TS's Complaint. Dated: April 28, 2010 THE SIMON LAW FIRM, P.C. By: /s/ Timothy E. Grochocinski TIMOTHY E. GROCHOCINSKI tgrochocinski@simonlawpc.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Teleconference Systems, LLC Dated: April 28, 2010 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP By: /s/ Edward R. Reines EDWARD R. REINES edward.reines@weil.com Attorneys for Defendant Tandberg, Inc. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED UNIT ED S 18 S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N D IS T IC T R OF STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT 1 A C LI _________________ Edward M. Chen U.S. Magistrate Judge UNITED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO Judge Edward M. Chen R NIA IT IS SO ORDERED FO dward Judge E M. Che n R NIA O OR IT IS S RT U O NO DERED RT U O RT H NO RT H Case No. C 10-01325 EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT FILER'S ATTESTATION I, Edward R. Reines, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Joint Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, paragraph X.B., I hereby attest that Timothy Grochocinski has concurred in this filing. Dated: April 28, 2010 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP By: /s/ Edward R. Reines EDWARD R. REINES edward.reines@weil.com Attorneys for Defendant Tandberg, Inc. 2 Case No. C 10-01325 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?