Teleconference Systems LLC v. Tandberg, Inc et al
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDINFG TIME TO ANSWER re 20 Stipulation filed by Ericsson, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/9/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & W EST LLP
A TTORNEYS A T L AW M OUNTAIN VIEW
LYNN H. PASAHOW (CSB NO. 054283) lpasahow@fenwick.com VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI (CSB NO. 168633) vdemarchi@fenwick.com HECTOR RIBERA (CSB NO. 221511) hribera@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: (650) 988-8500 Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 Attorneys for Defendant ERICSSON, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant, Ericsson, Inc. ("Ericsson"), on the one hand, and plaintiff Teleconference Systems, LLC ("Teleconference"), on the other hand, hereby stipulate pursuant to Local Rule 61(a) to enlarge the time within which Ericsson may answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint to and including July 12, 2010. This is the second enlargement of time for Ericsson to /// ///
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME CASE NO. C 10-01325 EMC
TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. TANDBERG, INC., AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., BAYER CORPORATION, ERICSSON, INC., AND ONE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendants.
Case No. C 10-01325 EMC STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT ERICSSON, INC.'S RESPONSE TO TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC'S COMPLAINT ; ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FEN WICK & W EST LLP
A TTORNEYS A T L AW M OUNTAIN VIEW
answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint. Dated: June 9, 2010 THE SIMON LAW FIRM, P.C.
By: _s/Anthony G. Simon______________ Anthony G. Simon Attorneys for Plaintiff TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC Dated: June 9, 2010 FENWICK & WEST LLP
By:
s/Virginia K. DeMarchi Virginia K. DeMarchi
Attorneys for Defendant ERICSSON, INC.
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Virginia K. DeMarchi, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 9, 2010. By:
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T
s/Virginia K. DeMarchi Virginia K. DeMarchi
IT IS SO ORDERED:
UNIT ED
RT U O
S
N
F D IS T IC T O R
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME CASE NO. C 10-01325 EMC
A
_________________ Edward M. Chen U.S. Magistrate Judge
ER
C
LI
FO
d Judge E
ward M
. Chen
R NIA
IT IS S
O ORD
ERED
NO
RT
H
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?