Jones v. AIG Risk Management Inc et al
Filing
58
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT re 57 Stipulation, filed by Chartis U.S. Inc, American International Group Inc, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA, American International Group of Companies, Chartis Inc, Chartis Holdings Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/1/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010)
Jones v. AIG Risk Management Inc et al
Doc. 58
1 REBECCA R. WEINREICH, SB# 155684 2
3 E-Mail: weinreich@lbbslaw.com HELLAR-ANN HANCOCK, SB# 117075 E-Mail: hhancockCQ).lbbslaw.com
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14
221 North Figueroa Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 250-1800 Facsimile: (213) 481-0621 Attorneys for Defendants
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Tammi Jones, Plaintiff,
) CASE NO. CV 1O-01374EMC
)
v.
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
AIG Risk Management, Inc.; AIG Construction) Risk Management Group; American ) International Companies; American ) International Group of Companies; American ) International Group, Inc., National Union Fire ) Insurance Company of Pittsburgh P A and Does ) 1 through 20, ) Defendants. --------------)
) STIPULATION TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS THE RIGHT TO RESPOND BY ANSWER OR MOTION ; ORDER
) [The Honorable Edward M. Chen] ) )
»
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES that Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint and that Defendants are entitled to respond to the First Amended Complaint, by way of answer or motion(s) within 20 days after the date the Court enters an Order approving this Stipulation. DATED: Octoberdll, 2010 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
26
27
LEWIS 28
BRISBOIS
BISGMRD &1MIHUP
4852-2611-6615.1
-110-01374 EMC ~TTPIJLATTON TO PERMIT FIT,TNCT F FTR~T AMENDED rOMPT.ATNT O
Dockets.Justia.com
By /:;/ Rebecca R. Weinreich
Rebecca R. Weinreich Hellar-Ann Hancock Attorneys for Defendants
DATED: October~~2010
Edward M. Mastrangelo Attorneys for Plaintiff, TAMMJ JONES
)
Richard A. eItzer
::L~$4
1 IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
11/1/10
UNIT ED
S
The status conference currently set for 11/17/10 at 3:00 p.m. is reset for 11/17/10 at 2:30 p.m. An updated joint status conference statement shall be filed by 11/10/10. The 11/17/10 motion EDWARDM. CDINTRIC HE S hearing United States ESagistrate JudTeC TM g TA is vacated.
J
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
411:'i2-a611-M
1:5.1
156
~TIPtJT.ATT()N ro PERMIT FII JNH OP FIR!il.T' AMF.NI1Fr1 rnMPT.A.1Nr
[o-01374.fMC
J9Z119S >P!C!
A
C
LI
FO
ward M udge Ed
. Chen
R NIA
DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO
RT U O
NO
RT
H
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [X] FEDERAL COURT PROOF OF SERVICE Tammi Jones v. AIG Risk Management, et al. - File No. Case No. CV 10-01374 EMC STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to the action. My business address is 221 North Figueroa Street, Suite 1200, Los Angeles, California 90012. I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. On October 29, 2010, I served the following document(s): STIPULATION TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FIRST AMENDEn COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS THE RIGHT TO RESPOND BY ANSWER OR MOTION The documents were served by the following means: (BY COURT'S CM/ECF SYSTEM) Pursuant to Local Rule, I electronically filed the documents with the Clerk of the Court using the CMlECF system, which sent notification of that filing to the persons listed above.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the above is true and correct. Executed on October 29,2010, at Los Angeles, Califo
26
27
LEWIS 28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
4852-2611-6615.1
&SMlHIlP
STTPTJT.A nON
TO PF.RMTT FH ,INn OF FTRST A MF.NDED
10-01374 EMC
COMPT.A TNT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?