Gonzalez v. United States of America

Filing 5

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER AND CONTINUING CMC re 4 Stipulation filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/7/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332) United States Attorney THOMAS MOORE (ASBN 4305-078T) Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division BLAKE D. STAMM (CTBN 301887) 9th Floor Federal Building 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7065 Attorneys for the United States of America 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. NIDIA A. GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-10-1387-MEJ STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER AND CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON For the reason that additional time is needed in order that the United States Attorneys' Office may review Internal Revenue Service administrative files, it is hereby stipulated by and between plaintiff in this matter and defendant United States of America, through their respective counsel, that the time for the defendant to answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint herein be extended to and including the 15th day of June, 2010, and that the case management conference scheduled for July 8, 2010, be continued to July 22, 2010, at 10:00 A.M. /// /// /// /// /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. TO EXTEND TIME TO ANS. & CONT. THE CMC AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (NO. CV-10-1387) Dated: June 7, 2010 /s/ SCOTT H. FREWING, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff JOSEPH P.RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ BLAKE D. STAMM Assistant United States Attorney Tax Division Attorneys for Defendant PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?