Mas v. Cumulus Media Inc.

Filing 58

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING MOTION HEARING FOR 10/28/11 re 52 Joint MOTION for Settlement Notice of Joint Motion and Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Cumulus Media Partners Susquehanna Corporation, 57 Stipulation, filed by Cumulus Media Partners Susquehanna Corporation Motion Hearing set for 10/28/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/8/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Cindi L. Pusateri (State Bar No. 216899) Email: cpusateri@meyerwhite.com Hien Nguyen (State Bar No. 229794) E-mail: hnguyen@meyerwhite.com MEYER WHITE LLP 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 960 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 330-1760 Facsimile: (213) 330-1759 Theresia Moser (pro hac vice) Email: tmoser@meyerwhite.com Ashley Herd (pro hac vice) Email: aherd@meyerwhite.com MEYER WHITE LLP Southern Dairies Building 621 North Avenue, N.E. Suite C-150 Atlanta, Georgia 30308-2864 Telephone: (404) 537-5330 Facsimile: (404) 537-5340 Attorneys for Defendant CUMULUS MEDIA PARTNERS SUSQUEHANNA CORPORATION AKA CMP SUSQUEHANNA CORP. Robert Ottinger (State Bar No. 156825) Email: Robert@ottingerlaw.com The Ottinger Firm, P.C. One Market Spear Tower, Suite 3600 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 293-8223 Fax: (415) 520-0555 Attorney for Plaintiff BRIAN MAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 22 23 BRIAN MAS, on behalf of himself and classes of those similarly situated, 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs, v. CUMULUS MEDIA PARTNERS SUSQUEHANNA CORPORATION, Defendants. Case No. C 10-01396 EMC Assigned to: Judge Edward M. Chen STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING CASE NO. C 10-01396 EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Subject to the approval of the Court, Plaintiff Brian Mas and Defendant Cumulus Media Partners Susquehanna Corp. aka CMP Susquehanna Corp. (collectively “the Parties”) enter into the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2: 1. A Hearing on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement (“Hearing”) is currently scheduled to take place in this Action before Judge Edward Chen on October 14, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 of the above-referenced court. 2. The Parties have a conflict on that day and have identified October 28, 2011, as a mutually-agreeable date to continue the Hearing. 3. The Parties jointly stipulate and request, subject to the Court’s approval, that the October 14, 2011 Hearing be continued to October 28, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5. 14 15 Stipulated to: September 7, 2011 MEYER WHITE LLP 16 17 By: /s/Theresia Moser Theresia Moser 18 Attorneys for Defendant CUMULUS MEDIA PARTNERS SUSQUEHANNA CORP. AKA CMP SUSQUEHANNA CORP. 19 20 21 22 Stipulated to: September 7, 2011 OTTINGER FIRM PC 23 24 25 26 By: /s/Robert Ottinger Robert Ottinger Attorneys for Plaintiff BRIAN MAS 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING CASE NO. C 10-01396 EMC 1 2 3 Based on the Parties’ foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, the Parties’ Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement is set to be heard by the Court on October 28, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 S UNIT ED 7 September 8, 2011 DERED O OR IT IS S EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 9 LI ER n M. Che A H 12 RT 11 dward Judge E NO 10 R NIA Dated: FO 6 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 5 N D IS T IC T R OF C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING CASE NO. C 10-01396 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?