Satre et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al

Filing 184

ORDER VACATING HEARINGS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/6/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RODRICK SATRE and BONITA SATRE DALEY, 8 No. C 10-01405 JSW Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 ORDER VACATING HEARINGS Defendants. For the Northern District of California United States District Court WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, ET AL., 11 12 13 14 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the multiple motions in this 15 matter which have been noticed for hearing on Friday, March 14, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., are 16 appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing date is hereby 17 VACATED. The motions will be taken under submission and decided on the papers. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: March 6, 2014 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 RODRICK SATRE et al, 7 Plaintiff, 8 11 For the Northern District of California CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. 9 WELLS FARGO BANK, NA et al, 10 Defendant. United States District Court Case Number: CV10-01405 JSW / 12 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 13 That on March 6, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing 14 said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office 15 delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 Bonita Satre Daley 18 Rodrick I. Satre 530 Santa Fe Avenue 19 Richmond, CA 94801 20 21 Dated: March 6, 2014 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?