Satre et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
Filing
184
ORDER VACATING HEARINGS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/6/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2014)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RODRICK SATRE and BONITA SATRE
DALEY,
8
No. C 10-01405 JSW
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
ORDER VACATING HEARINGS
Defendants.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, ET AL.,
11
12
13
14
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the multiple motions in this
15
matter which have been noticed for hearing on Friday, March 14, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., are
16
appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing date is hereby
17
VACATED. The motions will be taken under submission and decided on the papers.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
Dated: March 6, 2014
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6 RODRICK SATRE et al,
7
Plaintiff,
8
11
For the Northern District of California
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
9 WELLS FARGO BANK, NA et al,
10
Defendant.
United States District Court
Case Number: CV10-01405 JSW
/
12 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
13
That on March 6, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
14 said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
15 delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
Bonita Satre Daley
18 Rodrick I. Satre
530 Santa Fe Avenue
19 Richmond, CA 94801
20
21 Dated: March 6, 2014
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?