Spindler et al v. Johnson & Johnson Corp. et al
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 13, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 13, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CORP., et al., Defendants. / United States District Court BARTON SPINDLER, et al., Plaintiff, No. C-10-1414 MMC ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Before the Court is Urvashi Sen's Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice, filed July 27, 2010, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-3. "Each attorney requesting to be admitted to practice under Civil L.R. 11-3 must pay to the Clerk a fee," Civil L.R. 11-3(d), which fee is $210. The required fee was not submitted with the application. Further, although the Clerk as a courtesy telephonically notified counsel of the omission, the fee was not submitted subsequent to the filing of the application. Accordingly, the application is hereby DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?