Johnson et al v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 80

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND HEARING TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing Rescheduled for 10/20/2011 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/8/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2011)

*E-Filed 9/8/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

JAMES MCMANIS (40958)
CHRISTINE PEEK (234573)
RUBY H. KAZI (243872)
McMANIS FAULKNER
A Professional Corporation
50 West San Fernando Street, 10th Floor
San Jose, California 95113
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
408-279-3244
Emails:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
CYNTHIA JOHNSON AND JAMONT JOHNSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11
12
13

CYNTHIA JOHNSON AND JAMONT
JOHNSON, as individuals,
Plaintiffs,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

vs.
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a public entity,
ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE, a department of the County of
Alameda, ALAMEDA COUNTY
SHERIFF’S OFFICE DETENTION AND
CORRECTION DIVISION, a department of
the County of Alameda, DEPUTY SHERIFF
KEITH W. GILKERSON, an individual, and
DOES 1-50, inclusive,

Case No. CV 10-01437 RS
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE
TO FILE STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL AND HEARING TO SHOW
CAUSE

Defendants.

21
22
23
24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE
TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND HEARING TO SHOW CAUSE; CASE NO.: CV 10-01437 (RS)

1

ORDER

2

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, and the parties’ having stipulated to same,

3

the parties’ stipulation is hereby APPROVED. The deadline to file a stipulation of dismissal is

4

continued from September 8, 2011 to October 13, 2011. The hearing to show cause why

5

dismissal has not been entered is continued from September 15, 2011 to October 20, 2011 at

6

1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3 on the 17th Floor of the United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate

7

Avenue, San Francisco.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12

9/8/11
DATED: ____________________

_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE
TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND HEARING TO SHOW CAUSE; CASE NO.: CV 10-01437 (RS)