Hammond et al v. County of Contra Costa et al
Filing
76
STIPULATION AND ORDER RELEASING PERSONAL ITEMS BELONGING TO DECEDENT PAUL HAMMOND FROM THE CONTRA COST ACOUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE'S EVIDENCE LOCKER. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/2/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2011)
1
GEARINGER LAW GROUP
2
825 VAN NESS AVENUE, 4TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
94109-7847
3
4
BRIAN GEARINGER (State Bar #146125)
R. STEPHEN M. LAROE (State Bar #245269)
5
THE SCOTT LAW FIRM
6
1375 Sutter Street, Suite 222
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
94109-7837
(415) 561-9601
7
8
9
10
11
JOHN HOUSTON SCOTT (State Bar #72578)
LIZABETH N. de VRIES (State Bar #227215)
Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER HAMMOND,
MATTHEW HAMMOND, EMILY HAMMOND,
a minor, and LINDSEY HAMMOND, a minor
12
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Case No. CV 10-01454 JCS
CHRISTOPHER HAMMOND, MATTHEW
HAMMOND, individually and as Successors
in Interest for PAUL HAMMOND, decedent;
and EMILY HAMMOND, a minor, and
LINDSEY HAMMOND, a minor,
individually and as Successors in Interest for
PAUL HAMMOND, decedent, and by and
through their Guardian ad Litem, CHERYL
HAMMOND,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RELEASING PERSONAL
ITEMS BELONGING TO DECEDENT
PAUL HAMMOND FROM THE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE’S EVIDENCE LOCKER
Action Filed: April 6, 2010
Trial Date:
December 5, 2011
Plaintiffs,
v.
22
23
24
25
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, ROBERT
REICHERT, KEVIN MORRIS, SHERIFF
WARREN E. RUPF and DOES ONE to ONE
HUNDRED, inclusive.
Defendants.
26
27
28
This matter has been settled in its entirety as to Defendants Kevin Morris and Robert
Reichert (ECF Dkt 71) and Plaintiffs Christopher Hammond and Matthew Hammond (ECF Dkt
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RELEASING
ITEMS BELONGING TO DECEDENT PAUL HAMMOND
1
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, CASE NO. CV-10-1454 JCS
1
74.) The only remaining parties are Defendant County of Contra Costa and Plaintiffs Emily
2
Hammond and Lindsey Hammond. The remaining parties have reached a tentative settlement
3
that must be approved by the Court because Plaintiffs Emily Hammond and Lindsey Hammond
4
are minors. Plaintiffs Emily Hammond and Lindsey Hammond will file a motion with this Court
5
once they select the terms by which the settlement funds will be structured.
6
Settling Plaintiffs Christopher Hammond and Matthew Hammond desire to obtain the
7
personal belongings of their father, decedent Paul Hammond, that were in his possession at the
8
time of his death. These items are as follows:
9
“Personal accessories” described as “Hammond’s Reported Belongings” located at 2
10
Row 13 of the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office’s Evidence Locker. (See document CC
11
001132 produced by Defendant Contra Costa County.)
12
“Bladed weapons/Kniv” described as “Hammond’s Reported Knife (Wht Box)” located
13
at 2 Row 13 of the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office’s Evidence Locker. (See document CC
14
001132 produced by Defendant Contra Costa County.)
15
“Money” described as “U.S. Currency – $17.00 from Hammond’s Wallet” located at Safe
16
3 of the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office’s Evidence Locker. (See document CC 001133
17
produced by Defendant Contra Costa County.)
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
19
Upon Order of this Court, Defendant Contra Costa County will release the following
20
three items either to Plaintiff Christopher Hammond or Plaintiff Matthew Hammond, subject to
21
the conditions set forth below:
22
1.
“Personal accessories”;
23
2.
“Bladed weapons/Kniv”; and
24
3.
“Money.”
25
Plaintiff Christopher Hammond or Plaintiff Matthew Hammond (1) must contact Deputy
26
Counsel Janet L. Holmes to arrange a mutually convenient time and date to obtain the above
27
items; (2) must bring a death certificate for Paul Hammond; (3) must bring a birth certificate for
28
either Plaintiff Christopher Hammond or Plaintiff Matthew Hammond and (4) must bring a
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RELEASING
ITEMS BELONGING TO DECEDENT PAUL HAMMOND
2
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, CASE NO. CV-10-1454 JCS
1
government-issued photo identification for either Plaintiff Christopher Hammond or Plaintiff
2
Matthew Hammond.
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
4
Dated: August 1, 2011
5
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL OF CONTRA
COSTA
6
By: /s/ Janet L. Holmes
Janet L. Holmes
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA and SHERIFF
WARREN E. RUPF
7
8
9
10
Dated: August 1, 2011
GEARINGER LAW GROUP
11
By: /s/ Brian Gearinger
Brian Gearinger
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
12
13
14
Dated: August 1, 2011
THE SCOTT LAW FIRM
15
By: /s/ John Houston Scott
John Houston Scott
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
16
17
S
20
By:
Hon. Joseph C. Spero
ero
h C. Sp
United States DistrictJuCourtpMagistrate Judge
dge Jose
22
A
H
ER
LI
RT
21
FO
NO
R NIA
2
Dated: August ___, 2011
UNIT
ED
19
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
18
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RELEASING
ITEMS BELONGING TO DECEDENT PAUL HAMMOND
3
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, CASE NO. CV-10-1454 JCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?