Barajas v. Kay-Co Investments Inc. et al
Filing
25
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/8/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2010)
<![CDATA[
Barajas v. Kay-Co Investments Inc. et al
Doc. 25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
**E-filed 9/8/10**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION LIDIA BARAJAS, v. Plaintiff, No. C 10-1461 RS ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KAY-CO INVESTMENTS, INC. et al., Defendant. ____________________________________/ On August 12, 2010, an order issued requiring plaintiff to show cause why the remaining claims and defendants in this action should not be dismissed, given her failure to appear or participate in the litigation, as outlined therein. Plaintiff was advised that if she elected not to file a response to the order to show cause by August 31, 2010, the action would be dismissed. No response has been filed. Accordingly, good cause appearing, this action is hereby dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 9/7/10 RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
